Should there only be 1 belt per division?

[~GOAT~]

Ive heard Floyd Mayweather dicuss his displeasure over so so many belts per division and that there are so many divisions out there!








I think personally that they should just keep it to WBC, WBO, WBA



Thats it

[jrosales13]

No IBF?

WBO>IBF?

[~GOAT~]

No IBF?

WBO>IBF?

is IBF better than WBO??


can you rank them for me? im not sure which one is the best in order. all i know is WBC is best




thanks

[Afactor4]

It looks cooler when boxers have like three different belts on them.

[GreatestIam]

I think there should be 1 world championship belt and then 3 other divisional belts, so it yields variety and a chance for championship matches through out the division not soley in just a fight!

[~GOAT~]

It looks cooler when boxers have like three different belts on them.

i agree. UFC seems kinda boring with only 1 belt per division

[GreatestIam]

There should only be the IBF WBA WBC and WBO.. WBC should be the WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP as there sanctioning and prices to hold the title are better and are the most recongized. Then it should be WBA, IBF, WBO..

[jrosales13]

is IBF better than WBO??


can you rank them for me? im not sure which one is the best in order. all i know is WBC is best




thanks

WBC is garbage also though... But, why would you have the WBO and not the IBF? Or better yet why not take it back to the 60' and 70's like my homie Shadows mentioned and only have the WBC and WBA?

But, in reality IBO>all this 4 major belts... Fuck all this greedy asses sanctioning bodies...

[GreatestIam]

WBO is actually held by the better fighters of many divison right now, including HW,MW,WW and JW

[~GOAT~]

i really dont see what is the difference between WBC WBO WBA lmao