Letter sent to ESPN OMBUDSMAN, RE: Teddy Atlas

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PACHUGGER
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2007
    • 1321
    • 94
    • 79
    • 1,691

    #21
    Good guts there, bro. Nice letter. Hope that reaches ESPN's decision maker.

    Comment

    • Left Banned Tua
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 8398
      • 205
      • 132
      • 9,734

      #22
      Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR
      i'd like to buy a U.

      Comment

      • MindBat
        floyd gobbler
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jun 2006
        • 16853
        • 571
        • 841
        • 25,210

        #23
        It's a shame it has come to this, but Manny allowed it to happen.

        The majority of the boxing public and even the casual fan would agree to getting tested, one boxer even inviting anyone to test his pubic hairs during his fight, for the chance to collect a guaranteed $30-$40 million dollars for 36 minutes of work.

        Taking the test would've avoided all the drama.

        Comment

        • MindBat
          floyd gobbler
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jun 2006
          • 16853
          • 571
          • 841
          • 25,210

          #24
          Taking the tests, passing, and beating the champ would have been sweet revenge.

          Comment

          • MR. SMILEY
            Pac is God!
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2007
            • 1457
            • 111
            • 71
            • 7,852

            #25
            Originally posted by Mr. Copycat
            Letter sent to ESPN OMBUDSMAN, RE: Teddy Atlas
            Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:31 pm
            by Davepinoy



            Below is a letter i sent to the ombudsman of ESPN which is self explanatory. Your comments would be highly appreciated.

            14 Jan 2010

            Gentleman/Madame:

            I am very interested in the disposition of ESPN management regarding the Teddy Atlas, "Pacquiao email gate". I want to find out, in the wake of the journalistic incompetence of Mr Atlas, ESPN's move to protect the public from unvalidated "sources", hearsay, or a black propaganda against a person who has been regarded not only as legend in boxing, but a philantrophist, an artist and a potential politician. This "Atlasgate" has been dragging the good name of ESPN and it would be unfair for the company to be dragged down into what i believe is a propaganda, unless Mr Atlas is willing to reveal his sources and the appropriate steps he made to validate the veracity of such information. My personal thoughts why Mr Atlas has taken a personal crusade to discredit Pacquiao lies on three possibilities. He was paid and part of the GBP and Floyd Mayweather Spin Job. He has to grind an axe against Manny Pacquiao for turning down his overtures to replace Freddie Roach, or he is just an incompetent boxing analyst. I discounted the last possibility knowing Mr Atlas had been in the business for so many years. Surely, a man of his intellect would understand the strict ethical standards of his profession. With convenient access to media, and an unvalidated information could ruin the reputation of anyone unjustly. Neither do i have evidence to the effect of the other two possibilities. But either way, selfish motives are of course a taboo in journalism.
            ESPN through the years of its existence had been one of the major players of sports news. It has built up a reputation of objectivity and i cant remember in its history, ever being in a situation where its integrity is in question. No doubt the corporate heads of the company had rightly conceptualize directions and executed its goals of building up its image and social responsibility. It gives me the goose bump, thinking that all those efforts may go for naught, only for one single incompetence of one person whom i think had lost his objectivity and colored his profession with personal motives.

            The public is awaiting ESPN's decision on this issue. From my corporate experience, this opportunity could still be a win-win situation both for ESPN and Mr. Atlas. What should not be lost is the focus for ESPN's credibility as viewed by the sporting fans. In the same respect, Mr Atlas has still so many opportunities in his chosen field, beyond journalism which is not his forte.

            The public awaits the development of this issue and i hope the decision would, in the end, protect ESPN's image and social responsibility to the public.

            Thank you.

            davepinoys actual name
            Go for it bro..

            Comment

            • Bigchill79
              Interim Champion
              • Jul 2004
              • 730
              • 13
              • 0
              • 6,847

              #26
              Originally posted by Mr. Copycat
              Letter sent to ESPN OMBUDSMAN, RE: Teddy Atlas
              Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:31 pm
              by Davepinoy


              14 Jan 2010

              Gentleman/Madame:

              I am very interested in the disposition of ESPN management regarding the Teddy Atlas, "Pacquiao email gate". I want to find out, in the wake of the journalistic incompetence of Mr Atlas, ESPN's move to protect the public from unvalidated "sources", hearsay, or a black propaganda against a person who has been regarded not only as legend in boxing, but a philantrophist, an artist and a potential politician. This "Atlasgate" has been dragging the good name of ESPN and it would be unfair for the company to be dragged down into what i believe is a propaganda, unless Mr Atlas is willing to reveal his sources and the appropriate steps he made to validate the veracity of such information. My personal thoughts why Mr Atlas has taken a personal crusade to discredit Pacquiao lies on three possibilities. He was paid and part of the GBP and Floyd Mayweather Spin Job. He has to grind an axe against Manny Pacquiao for turning down his overtures to replace Freddie Roach, or he is just an incompetent boxing analyst. I discounted the last possibility knowing Mr Atlas had been in the business for so many years. Surely, a man of his intellect would understand the strict ethical standards of his profession. With convenient access to media, and an unvalidated information could ruin the reputation of anyone unjustly. Neither do i have evidence to the effect of the other two possibilities. But either way, selfish motives are of course a taboo in journalism.
              ESPN through the years of its existence had been one of the major players of sports news. It has built up a reputation of objectivity and i cant remember in its history, ever being in a situation where its integrity is in question. No doubt the corporate heads of the company had rightly conceptualize directions and executed its goals of building up its image and social responsibility. It gives me the goose bump, thinking that all those efforts may go for naught, only for one single incompetence of one person whom i think had lost his objectivity and colored his profession with personal motives.

              The public is awaiting ESPN's decision on this issue. From my corporate experience, this opportunity could still be a win-win situation both for ESPN and Mr. Atlas. What should not be lost is the focus for ESPN's credibility as viewed by the sporting fans. In the same respect, Mr Atlas has still so many opportunities in his chosen field, beyond journalism which is not his forte.

              The public awaits the development of this issue and i hope the decision would, in the end, protect ESPN's image and social responsibility to the public.

              Thank you.

              davepinoys actual name

              Dont Give up your day job.

              Comment

              • renren40
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2006
                • 1806
                • 60
                • 16
                • 8,052

                #27
                Originally posted by Hijo de Dios
                Why is it ONLY the Pacquiao fans who have to sue, boycott, threaten, petition, flame, bombard with letters, etc every time that someone says something that isn't positive about Pacquiao?

                What is that about?

                What other fighter had fans that need to boycott and write letters? What other fighter has Facebook pages dedicated to making 'funny' photos of his opponents?

                We are fans of a sport where one guy is trying to render the other guy temporarily unconscious , FFS.

                These letters and boycotts and petitions are not manly. At all.
                chill out man ...

                Fans can do whatever the hell they want ...

                Atlas cant say whatever the hell he wants without consequences...

                He's supposed to be neutral and professional...

                It's obvious hes a Flamingo now...

                I wonder how much GBP paid his ***ot ass

                Comment

                • ANDROID_DOES
                  What Apple CANT!
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jul 2007
                  • 10265
                  • 459
                  • 205
                  • 17,529

                  #28
                  Dear Mr. Copycat

                  We here at ESPN hire who we want, when we want. We have nothing but the best people working for us. Our job is to get the best ratings possible and it looks like we are doing a good job. Although I understand your concern, you also have to open your eyes and realize there's many people that wouldn't agree with you. I thank you for watching and contributing to the billions of dollars we make. If you don't like our shows or employees please call your local cable provider and ask to have ESPN removed from your programming.

                  Sincerely,
                  ESPN

                  Comment

                  • Larrysbird
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 662
                    • 9
                    • 4
                    • 6,793

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Hijo de Dios
                    someone says something that isn't positive about Pacquiao?
                    I think it's positive for the public to know the source so we can really know Pac is juicing up. In that way we can blame Pac of being roider. Make sense?

                    Comment

                    • renren40
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 1806
                      • 60
                      • 16
                      • 8,052

                      #30
                      Originally posted by MindBat
                      Taking the tests, passing, and beating the champ would have been sweet revenge.
                      wtf are you talking about ....

                      MAnny is the champ....

                      he has passed every test NSAC demands...

                      if NSAC demands it he will take it ...

                      Floyd dont run ****...floyd is a contender not a champ

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP