Tweet
Not only is he fighter of the decade but it should be noted that he is the most exciting fighter of the decade. He is a fan favorite who did more for this sport than anyone else this decade. That's a top 10 that mayweather would not make it on to as many of his fights have been complete let downs for the fans and hurt the sport.
-
-
Cotto isnt in my top 10. Other then that it is an alright list.Comment
-
***** : decade havent ended yet...Comment
-
Good list...Comment
-
List makes sense. No * for Pacquiao. Just because he didnt wanna take a test. Wheres the physical evidence. There is evidence for Bonds though. And overall Pacquiaos achievements really just shine over Mayweathers.Comment
-
hehehe all the crying and whining and accusations without evidence in the end..
pacman is the man... fighter of the decade..
cong****...
***** butthurt?Comment
-
w.t.f?
no no no.
lets reorder the last few.......
in at no. 5 we have hopkins. losses to taylor dont forget and looked whats happened to him three times in last couple of years!
did nothing unexpected to either tarver or pavlik.
no 4. pacman. ok, its true...he did beat all the over the hill mexicans except one, on two occasions..you know who it is.
the "jump" makes little difference to his status in my mind as he moved through lighweight to beat a guy the mallignaggi just beat and he has only had 5 ko,s! on to oscar, did anyone see the weigh in? oscar looked a mess and roach new then it would be a piece of piss beating an over the hill weight drained fighter with no hunger left.
then theres our very own ricky hatton, i honestly felt sick when he was knocked out but, in the back of my mind i knew he would lose....why? i will tell you, he has been in many wars and has always been waaaay to easy to hit and i had previously predicted a one sided points victory to pacman as ricky was now 40+ fights and nearing the end anyway.
miguel cotto is/was the only fighter many thought would win considering many of the facts. he was strong,powerful,a very good tecnical fighter,patient but, as in a few fights prior to this he has shown major weakness, corley nearly had him,so did torres,so did mosley,so did judah,so did the other guy?(olympics?) roach saw all of this and knew if speed got through it would kill.
i have two points i would like to make here,
1. in the whole fight pacman took powershots like they were jabs and in the fianl session he ate it like it was his favourite food! of this i am suspect.
2. to end on a positive note i would say that if there were nothing to hide in this fight then i would say it was excellent win over a great fighter at a bigger weight but, it is only "one" real significant win.
no. 3. juan manuel marquez.
its simple, he beat paciaou twice and has chased him throught the weights to put it to paper but, pacman has avoided it.
marquez i think, in his wisdom took the fight with floyd but knew he would lose but never really losing. i think he is just bating pacman for the trilogy.
i mean, lets face it..pacman did lose to him in both fights so if pacman gets number 4 spot then jmm gets number three for beating him(twice).
number.2. the great welshman. joe calzaghe.
unbeaten! end of.
number 1. floyd is the man for sure.
it is arguable that floyd may have avoided certain people but, it was never fear of losing the fight. it was or is purely money.i dont think we will ever see what he can really do. dazzling speed,superoir boxing skill, etc, nobody even close.
i had trouble putting a fellow couintryman in second place but, i just had to.
p.s. pacman is good but, not this good. sorry.Comment
-
your wrong.Comment
-
@micky
lol! are you on crack?Comment
Comment