Comments Thread For: Top 25 Fighters of the 00’s Part III: The Top Ten

[Championart]

This must be a joke, no way in hell Calzaghe is above Hopkins for the same reasons Mayweather isn't above Pac on this list. Compare Calzaghes body of work to Hopkins and its not even close. Are you guys nuts as a matter of fact Hopkins should not be any less than the top two of the decade.

[Sinisterevo]

yeah....i don't agree with the list. sorry.

[Championart]

yeah....i don't agree with the list. sorry.

Seriously how can they justify Calzaghe over Hopkins? They lost credibility off that alone.

[jrich]

its so unfair for those fighter who are already in top. a former retire coward fighter came back last year with amazing boring fight and put it in again in the list? shame on this article. who cares!!!!

[Dirt]

This must be a joke, no way in hell Calzaghe is above Hopkins for the same reasons Mayweather isn't above Pac on this list. Compare Calzaghes body of work to Hopkins and its not even close. Are you guys nuts as a matter of fact Hopkins should not be any less than the top two of the decade.

Mayweather is undefeated but he keeps taking big fat Ls. Just because you. don't agree, that doesn't make it incorrect.


*****s aren't capable of thinking with any objectivity. Can't argue with the list.

People are mad because calzaghe, who is undefeated, is ranked higher than bhop. Yet the same folks get mad that pac is ranked higher than pbf. You guys tickle the sh.t outta me

[cool-jupiter]

The list is nice and, seemingly, quite objective. I've been wondering how American media came up with a non biased list of top fighters, but here it is. See, the legendary Mexican trio, Pacquiao, Wonjongkam, let alone Klitschko. good article and nice source for debate.

[talip bin osman]

This must be a joke, no way in hell Calzaghe is above Hopkins for the same reasons Mayweather isn't above Pac on this list. Compare Calzaghes body of work to Hopkins and its not even close. Are you guys nuts as a matter of fact Hopkins should not be any less than the top two of the decade.

perhaps it is bcoz hopkins lost twice in a row to taylor this decade...

then joe got a victory over the man hopkins cant beat in jones...

then factor in joe's victory over hopkins himself & then his undefeated record...

im not defending joe... im just trying to see it the way cliff rold saw it...

[disolly]

Pac should have an * beside his name, just like they want to do with Bonds whenever he makes it into the baseball hall of fame.

An accusation from floyd sr , doesn't make it true. That is why pac is suing those ******s. Anyways i agree with most of the list. Joe really didn't do enough in his career to be in the # 3 spot or even the top 10 in my opinion, especially when you consider Vital didn't even make the top 20.

[daggum]

cliff lol'd strikes again. calzaghe as number 3 what an absolute joke. the facts speak for themselves? 21 record TYING defenses. oh wow he tied the great sven ottke thats a worthy accomplishment. how come ottke isn't 1 or 2 then? does a controversial win over hopkins and a win over shot jones jr make him that much higher?

also look how pacquiao fought 4 of the top 10 guys at their natural weights at the time. while mayweather only fought 1 and that was bloated marquez at welterweight.

[ghost deini]

no way in hell is Calzaghe number 3

and i wonder if pacquiao will still keep that slot when they find out he's been juicing

i mean seriously what other explanation can there be as to why he left a potential $40 million on the table?

and no love for abraham, dawson and williams?

i know they ain't fought the most elite of opposition but come one if thats the case calzaghe shouldn't be so high either

dawson and abraham are undefeated surely they deserve to make the cut at least

ricky hatton is way too high in the list aswell if you ask me

and im a winky wright fan but come one his record in the 00's was 12-2-1 and he was number 20!