Way to represent your race you immature ****, now if I was like you I would say at least you guys have given us the MOB which has ****ed up boxing!!! But I won't stoop down to your level...wait up a minute I just did!!!
BBBWWWAHHHH!! Hey it can't be racist if it's the truth.. Ask any historian..Italians have given and contributed MUCH MUCH more to this world than your people ever have..Face truth, dont run from it
I don't think that Tito is better that every mexican fighter that ever lived, I like Mexican fighters not because the place of origin, but because the stereotype that they have nurtured of warriors, that don't avoid fighting with the best however many times necessary to show the world that they are best by not being afraid of the rest in addition to coming to fight not to dance. That's the kind of boxing I love. That's Titos way of boxing, he can lose, he did, and may be he will, but with heart.
True dat.. Just like on the show the Contender.. Alfonso Gomez that Mexican warrior challenged the toughest guy and beat his asz in the first week.. The rest of those bitches look for the easy fight each week. Mexicans are warriors... I think they get their spirit from the closeness with their family.. Classy, classy people
That's funny because when DLH fought Tito he kicked his ass thoroughly for the first 8 rounds!! Tito was confused!! Say what you want about the last four rounds, Oscar still won the first 8 rounds. That decision was a robbery. Based on Tito's suprised reaction after the winning announcement I'd say he probably thought he lost too!
This has been an argument that I've had w/ some friends. My response is that DLH was the one, Tito was a contender. Although Tito had a great record DLH had the exposure. This was exposed by the contract in which although they were both undefeated champs, DLH got the treatment and the money that is normally reserved for the champ. All local media in Puerto Rico was saying that Tito would have to win by KO because he would never win by D against DLH. That's is the reason for Tito's reaction. This was not amateur boxing where you get point for a clear hit, it was the subjective/objective observation of the fight by three individuals. I think tito won just because he was always pressuring DLH and when he connected you could see in DLH face that it hurted.
This has been an argument that I've had w/ some friends. My response is that DLH was the one, Tito was a contender. Although Tito had a great record DLH had the exposure. This was exposed by the contract in which although they were both undefeated champs, DLH got the treatment and the money that is normally reserved for the champ. All local media in Puerto Rico was saying that Tito would have to win by KO because he would never win by D against DLH. That's is the reason for Tito's reaction. This was not amateur boxing where you get point for a clear hit, it was the subjective/objective observation of the fight by three individuals. I think tito won just because he was always pressuring DLH and when he connected you could see in DLH face that it hurted.
That is a great summarization of the fight , however, those punches by DLH were thrown with power in conjunction with a masterful display of boxing.. I remember Tito's trunk being splattered with blood!! It certainly wasn't the worst of robberies in prizefighting history but it was an unjust decision!!
Comment