Comments Thread For: David Haye Inspired To Trash Talk By Naseem Hamed

[J.R]

I suggest you look up the featherweight rankings of the time and then you can see for yourself.


You can't have everything handed to you on a silver platter.

It's an argument:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumen..._and_arguments

Read the article, in an argument it is down to both parties to present evidence to strenghthen and support their individual claims.

You have done neither.

[donkim]

It's an arguement:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumen..._and_arguments

Read the article, in an argument it is down to both parties to present evedence to strenghthen their individual claims.

Not only should you look up the featherweight rankings,you should also look through this thread's history and realise how silly the post that you just made is.

[J.R]

Not only should you look up the featherweight rankings,you should also look through this thread's history and realise how silly the post that you just made is.

Whatever mate, i'm done with this childish ****.

Naseem Hamed fought ONE world class fighter, and he lost, not at any point did i knock Hamed or say he wasn't a decent fighter, i respect him and actually really enjoyed watching him growing up.

You obviously have little, if any knowledge of the sport, and as i can see are highly unlikely to back up your comments with facts and names, therefore this 'argument' is over.

Good day.

[The Underboss]

Yeah like how he got slapped by barrera

!!

[jthoang]

Not only should you look up the featherweight rankings,you should also look through this thread's history and realise how silly the post that you just made is.

LOL, donkim is the worst poster to argue with. I continue to read ****** arguments involving this guy. Gives me a nice laugh. He didn't knock Hamed and all you have to do is give him some names and it's over.

[jthoang]

It's an arguement:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumen..._and_arguments

Read the article, in an argument it is down to both parties to present evedence to strenghthen their individual claims.

HAHAHA, great counter.

[J.R]

HAHAHA, great counter.

Lol, the guy is a complete joke.

No wonder NSB is going down the pan with guys like this.

[donkim]

Whatever mate, i'm done with this childish ****.

Naseem Hamed fought ONE world class fighter, and he lost, not at any point did i knock Hamed or say he wasn't a decent fighter, i respect him and actually really enjoyed watching him growing up.

You obviously have little, if any knowledge of the sport, and as i can see are highly unlikely to back up your comments with facts and names, therefore this 'argument' is over.

Good day.

And yet you have still failed to look up the featherweight rankings of the time.I told you already that you are silly and ignorant of Hamed's resume,and you have proven yourself to be just that.


The facts are there lad,you're just too silly and ignorant to look them up.

LOL, donkim is the worst poster to argue with. I continue to read ****** arguments involving this guy. Gives me a nice laugh. He didn't knock Hamed and all you have to do is give him some names and it's over.

Did you not read my one of my earlier posts? He is clearly ignorant of the rankings of the time,otherwise he would never come out with such nonsense.


All he has to do is look up Hamed's resume(like the boxrec ranger that I suspect him to be) and then look through the ring rankings during Hamed's time as an elite fighter and he will find his answer there.

[J.R]

And yet you have still failed to look up the featherweight rankings of the time.I told you already that you are silly and ignorant of Hamed's resume,and you have proven yourself to be just that.


The facts are there lad,you're just too silly and ignorant to look them up.






Did you not read my one of my earlier posts? He is clearly ignorant of the rankings of the time,otherwise he would never come out with such nonsense.


All he has to do is look up Hamed's resume(like the boxrec ranger that I suspect him to be) and then look through the ring rankings during Hamed's time as an elite fighter and he will find his answer there.

NO. YOU came to me, came to my original post with an argument therefore it is your responsibility to prove me wrong, not the other way round, if you get back to me with solid facts, i will either defend myself, or hold my hands up and admit defeat, until then you are making a fool of yourself.

I have already helped you out with Kevin Kelley, if you are in fact pretending to know answers but don't, you still have the internet right in front of you to prove me wrong. Again, you argued against my original thread, so it is your job as instigator to prove ME wrong....

Again, my original statement was that the only decent fighter he fought was Barrera... Care to challenge that?

[Phatfarm1980]

Regardless of how good nas actually was, he was one of the most entertaining fighters to ever enter the ring. He had power, he flipped into the ring and he knocked people out. What more do people want??

......and he was funny as ***. He had chrisma and wit