Matthew Hatton or Nate Campbell (Who's the tougher Test for Floyd?)

[Joeyzagz]

I think Matthew Hatton is the much stronger fighter because he is a true welterweight and has a 4 year youth advantage over Floyd. Matt would actually be IBO Welterweight champ of the world if it werent for corrupt judge Steve Marshall.


Nate Campbell while skilled, is over the hill and I think hes just too small to do any damage.

How do you guys see both fights playing out?

[jpunieves]

Matt Hatton

[fugu]

Matthew Hatton is a worse fighter by far but neither is even remotely close to being a "test".

[Killa_Kali]

neither. both are patsies.

[Clegg]

This is beyond parody.

[FloydTBE]

Neither of these guys are a 'TOUGH' test. The better boxer would have to be campbell but hes only at 140lbs, whereas hatton is at 147lbs. Hatton is bigger n stronger, campbell is more speedier n better boxer.

[Malius]

Need 4th option either is a joke to fight.

They are good but not top 2% good, which flyod is.

[Joeyzagz]

Mayweather in Wembley Stadium would be epic, and Id watch that over Jerry Jones field any day. American fans are apathetic and will not support Boxing in Dallas.

[V.WEBB]

Not interested to even discuss this TS, real talk.

[Hemmorhoid H]

Neither

LOL