Pac fans

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Weebler I
    El Weeblerito I
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 31113
    • 1,468
    • 1,648
    • 54,550

    #1

    Pac fans

    I have backed Manny throughtout the negotiations as you've probably noticed. But I find myself wondering why 14 days was not enough. Can you guys shed any light on Pac's thinking?
  • MARKBNLV
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 17497
    • 789
    • 707
    • 27,868

    #2
    Originally posted by The Weebler II
    I have backed Manny throughtout the negotiations as you've probably noticed. But I find myself wondering why 14 days was not enough. Can you guys shed any light on Pac's thinking?
    he is dirty why would he not submit to tests 14 days prefight.if you smell smoke theres probably a fire.

    Comment

    • cyutetrick
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 811
      • 12
      • 0
      • 7,196

      #3
      40 million dollars is a lot of money... and i could only think pac thinks the following: #1. Its a who has more power situation, pac does not want to agree to floyds terms because he feels he is the draw and floyd wants too muh #2 He is really on roids... Either way i think its incredibly ****** and i think boxing needs some kind of chief in command to kick both fighters promoters in the ass and make the fighters fight, i think the excuse that pacquiao would be drained for the fight by taking a test 14 days before is pre-kindergardly ****** so i did not even consider it an option...

      Comment

      • civicvx
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2009
        • 1588
        • 50
        • 2
        • 1,857

        #4
        Originally posted by The Weebler II
        I have backed Manny throughtout the negotiations as you've probably noticed. But I find myself wondering why 14 days was not enough. Can you guys shed any light on Pac's thinking?
        It's easy just like I have alway said, Pacquiao is the blame for it. Pacquiao should have went easy on Cotto. After Mayweather saw what Pacquiao did to Cotto he changed his mind fast. Pacquiao scared Mayweather away so it's all Pacquiao fault. Don't blame Floyd, if it was you you would do the same too.

        Comment

        • B u r n e r
          Banned
          • Dec 2009
          • 1287
          • 48
          • 0
          • 1,456

          #5
          They all agreed that 14 days was fair.



          In that thread 266 people voted yes its fair...32 clowns voted no.

          Now that Pac has turned it down...they changed their tune from '14 days is fair' then when Pac turned it down rather then call Pac out on it like a real fan they said "well who is floyd to ask"...

          Pac fans are jokes.

          Chups said on January 7th at 11:23 P.M.

          " If Floyd offered 14 Days and they declined Pacs a duck"

          Comment

          • Lady Fan
            The Voice of Reason
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Oct 2008
            • 778
            • 126
            • 13
            • 10,293

            #6
            Originally posted by The Weebler II
            I have backed Manny throughtout the negotiations as you've probably noticed. But I find myself wondering why 14 days was not enough. Can you guys shed any light on Pac's thinking?
            Weebler, since all the Pacquiao detractors here are "full-fledged" World-Class boxers that are fully drug test savvy and can relate to proper testing procedures, it seems that their recommendations should be heeded without question. Never mind what Manny Pacquiao believes is right for himself. The experts here know better.

            Comment

            • Lady Fan
              The Voice of Reason
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Oct 2008
              • 778
              • 126
              • 13
              • 10,293

              #7
              Originally posted by Adrian 28
              They all agreed that 14 days was fair.



              In that thread 266 people voted yes its fair...32 clowns voted no.

              Now that Pac has turned it down...they changed their tune from '14 days is fair' then when Pac turned it down rather then call Pac out on it like a real fan they said "well who is floyd to ask"...

              Pac fans are jokes.

              Chups said on January 7th at 11:23 P.M.

              " If Floyd offered 14 Days and they declined Pacs a duck"
              The "Drug Testing" Experts have spoken. 14-day cutoff is fair.

              Comment

              • Left Banned Tua
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2010
                • 8398
                • 205
                • 132
                • 9,734

                #8
                Originally posted by The Weebler II
                I have backed Manny throughtout the negotiations as you've probably noticed. But I find myself wondering why 14 days was not enough. Can you guys shed any light on Pac's thinking?
                i don't really know.

                principle maybe?

                he's already agreeing to some tests that are already more than required?



                or maybe he really does think it weakens him?

                they were citing the morales fight when he lost.

                maybe pacquiao thinks the same will happen?

                the morales fight was different though. it was at 130 so was cutting weight , not eating much and dehydrated. the nsac blood tests take way more blood (they're testing for hiv , hephatitis , etc. not just drugs).

                maybe no one explained to pacquiao that it wouldn't be the same?

                1. less blood for a drug test
                2. he's not dehydrated because he's cutting weight
                3. he's not half starved because he's cutting weight

                remember taking blood is not much but how many of us has taken blood when we're dropping 15-20 lbs. less than are walk around weight , not eating much and dehydrating at the same time?

                Comment

                • Left Banned Tua
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 8398
                  • 205
                  • 132
                  • 9,734

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Adrian 28
                  They all agreed that 14 days was fair.



                  In that thread 266 people voted yes its fair...32 clowns voted no.

                  Now that Pac has turned it down...they changed their tune from '14 days is fair' then when Pac turned it down rather then call Pac out on it like a real fan they said "well who is floyd to ask"...

                  Pac fans are jokes.

                  Chups said on January 7th at 11:23 P.M.

                  " If Floyd offered 14 Days and they declined Pacs a duck"
                  yeah yeah

                  pacquiao ducked mayweather.

                  pacquiao is scared.

                  he's fighting clottey probably. who is floyd fighting?

                  Comment

                  • Left Banned Tua
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 8398
                    • 205
                    • 132
                    • 9,734

                    #10
                    Originally posted by cyutetrick
                    40 million dollars is a lot of money... and i could only think pac thinks the following: #1. Its a who has more power situation, pac does not want to agree to floyds terms because he feels he is the draw and floyd wants too muh #2 He is really on roids... Either way i think its incredibly ****** and i think boxing needs some kind of chief in command to kick both fighters promoters in the ass and make the fighters fight, i think the excuse that pacquiao would be drained for the fight by taking a test 14 days before is pre-kindergardly ****** so i did not even consider it an option...
                    sometimes packy is hard headed. i don't really understand how he thinks sometimes.

                    remember when he turned down oscar's initial offer? it was more money than he has ever made and yet he was playing hardball.

                    also remember when he turned down 50-50 with hatton? he ended up taking like 51 or 52 or something. not even that much money but just out of principle that he gets more than hatton.

                    i never understood both moves either. i thought he was ****** for playing hardball. i called him ******. in the end he got what he wanted.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP