How about telling me why exactly it's a flawed point, instead of just saying that? Or are you incapable?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How FLOYD haters make themselves sound like idiots.
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Felixion View PostYou talk **** about Floyd not having the balls to fight someone like Pacquiao, and instead fighting JMM. But at the same time, you don't talk **** about Pac fighting JMM.
It's an obvious double standard that proves that all of you who just want to point fingers do it for personal reasons, instead of real ones.
Use some logic.
JMM and Manny spent most of their careers in the featherweight divisions. Both of their fights were at 130. They had the right to fight each other.
Now, Floyd has been at welterweight for nearly 5 years, and he fought JMM, who has never fought above 135 and already plateu'd at weight. JMM had to move up another 2 classes at a supposed catchweight which Floyd didnt even bother to make, and JMM paid for it in the ring.
If you cant see the difference in Manny fighting JMM at 130 vs fighting floyd at 146 then you shouldnt be on this forum. Use some logic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Felixion View PostYou talk **** about Floyd not having the balls to fight someone like Pacquiao, and instead fighting JMM. But at the same time, you don't talk **** about Pac fighting JMM.
It's an obvious double standard that proves that all of you who just want to point fingers do it for personal reasons, instead of real ones.
Use some logic.
How FLOYD STANS make FLOYD FANS look bad: by making threads like this. Cripes man, do all you lads not feel fulfilled each day until you have made a crybaby thread in a boxing forum about how unfair hatred is for a man who goes out of his way to be hated in order to draw money?
Crikey, the dinnermashing on this forum does my head right in.
Comment
-
This has nothing to do with Manny fighting JMM vs. Floyd fighting JMM. It has to do with flawed criticism that comes from Floyd haters. You cannot actually try to make the point that there's a difference.
Pac had never fought at WW before De La Hoya either, yet he was wildly successful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Felixion View PostThis has nothing to do with Manny fighting JMM vs. Floyd fighting JMM. It has to do with flawed criticism that comes from Floyd haters. You cannot actually try to make the point that there's a difference.
Pac had never fought at WW before De La Hoya either, yet he was wildly successful.
Comment
-
It's not about how good Manny is, you narrow-minded prick. It's about the fact that a base assumption that a move up in weight will result in a LOSS has been PROVEN not to be the case, by your boy MANNY PACQUIAO HIMSELF.
Only because JMM lost can you then say it was a bad idea from the start, but it's hubris to make that assumption prior to the event actually taking place.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Felixion View PostIt's not about how good Manny is, you narrow-minded prick. It's about the fact that a base assumption that a move up in weight will result in a LOSS has been PROVEN not to be the case, by your boy MANNY PACQUIAO HIMSELF.
Only because JMM lost can you then say it was a bad idea from the start, but it's hubris to make that assumption prior to the event actually taking place.
Kosta Tzsuyu stayed at 140 his entire career for a reason. You think moving up in weight classes is simple and everyone can do it. Do you think Kosta shouldve moved up and fought Roy Jones? Using another example, tell me why Morales couldnt be successful above 130.
Comment
-
Hey, dip****, do you have a crystal ball?
Tell me exactly how you know that Manny CAN move up in weight? BECAUSE HE ****ING DID! Hahaha, you act as though it was a foregone conclusion that was written in the stars. The only reason we know that he was successful is because he rolled the dice and got in a fight that based on his size he wasn't supposed to win, just like Marquez was trying to do when he fought Floyd.
You're an idiot.
Comment
-
Comment