Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

yall must have forgot that Pacquiao ducked Mosley

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Michael Hall View Post
    Why can't you dopes get Mayweather off the brain? Is he that magnetic? Seriously?
    i rarely post negative stuffs about pbf you can check my history, i respect his skills and all but the TS is a known pbf supporter so that comeback just had to be said.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Michael Hall View Post
      Pacboy? Are you Pac's illigetimate son (good possibility)? LMAO!

      I can't imagine a Floyd fan with a screen name of "Mayweather Boy" and not being related.

      I take it you probably don't expect your opinion to be taken serious at anytime while posting on this forum.
      could have been worse. pacperson anyone?

      Comment


      • #33
        great, this thread has been ducked by the pac fans because apparently, pacquiao fought the guy that beat mosley, in a sense, pac already beat mosley.



        and these are the same people who go all over the board and write "triangle theories dont mean ****" when some one uses it against their god all mighty.
        Last edited by Equinox; 01-05-2010, 05:45 PM.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Equinox View Post
          you guys are right, Shane Mosley is completely irrelevant as a fighter and means 0 in the Welterweight division. Manny Pacquiao should go fight Jose Luis Castillo the guy that should have a win over Mayweather right?
          Castillo and Mosley have A game, B game, and C game

          Pacquiao and Mayweather have A game, A game, and A game.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Equinox View Post
            great, this thread has been ducked by the pac fans because apparently, pacquiao fought the guy that beat mosley, in a sense, pac already beat mosley.



            and these are the same people who go all over the board and write "triangle theories dont mean ****" when some one uses it against their god all mighty.
            That was in 07 and a different Cotto. Not to mention a different SSM (I don't think brother ****m [better than Roach] was in the corner at the time). If Cotto and Shane fought today, Shane wins with ease. Roach stated Cotto was damaged goods and I doubt they would have picked Cotto had Margarito not taken something out of him. Roach even said that you're never the same after a KO and said time after time Cotto wasn't the same fighter. Mosley was avoided by both Pacquiao and Mayweather because he presents a bad risk/reward ratio compared to JJM and Cotto. When Cotto almost pulled out of the fight because he refused to put his title on the line at 145. SMM stepped up to the plate and offered the same split/ come down in weight/ and put his WBA title on the line. He was ignored. I wouldn't call it a duck but they weren't exactly eager to fight him....That said I do believe Pac will fight SMM if he beats Berto and Pac beats Mayweather...

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Equinox View Post
              lol, pac fans are going to duck my facts with this??^^^





              what about the fact that alot of people thought Mosley beat Cotto and that Cotto received another Madison Square Garden gift?

              what about the fact that Pacquiao chose option B. of the following...

              Option A.Mosley comes off 2 knock outs over big men like Ricardo Mayorga at [U]154[/U], and welterweight king Antonio Margarito(guy who destroyed Cotto might I add)

              Option B.Cotto comes off a win over Michael Jennings(LOL), and barely gets by Joshua Clottey, again many people thought Clottey should have won and Cotto receives yet another Madiso Square Garden gift.



              I wonder why Pac chose option B? hmmmmmm....
              You took the words right out of my mouth...
              real boxing fans know why Roach/Pac chose Cotto..instead of Mosley(the official welter champion)..and it is debated that Mosley won the fight with Cotto... I have seen the video of Roach saying these things..its obvious they ducked Mosley..even after he agreed to come down to 140..they still ducked him!

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Equinox View Post
                great, this thread has been ducked by the pac fans because apparently, pacquiao fought the guy that beat mosley.



                and these are the same people who go all over the board and write "triangle theories dont mean ****" when some one uses it against their god all mighty.
                read again from the first page. mosley and cotto are about the same calibre imo. if you consider cotto shot and past prime, i can't imagine what your response would have been if pac agreed to fight mosley at 140 (mosley's offer).

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Equinox View Post
                  great, this thread has been ducked by the pac fans because apparently, pacquiao fought the guy that beat mosley, in a sense, pac already beat mosley.



                  and these are the same people who go all over the board and write "triangle theories dont mean ****" when some one uses it against their god all mighty.
                  Im not a Pac fan but that is not the logic. The point is he didnt fight Mosley, instead he fought Cotto. Which was hardly some huge step down to imply "ducking". Especially when Cotto holds a victory over Mosley.

                  If thats the case, I wish more people who "duck" Mosley would then fight someone of Cotto's calibre.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by ummmid View Post
                    read again from the first page. mosley and cotto are about the same calibre imo. if you consider cotto shot and past prime, i can't imagine what your response would have been if pac agreed to fight mosley at 140 (mosley's offer).
                    if pacquiao agreed to fight mosley at 140 and beat him, of course he would not get any credit from me. but i would bet anything that he gets credit from every single pac fan and others.

                    this would be the same thing as pacquio agreeing to fight De La Hoya at 147 and beating him

                    Oscar coming down to 147= Mosley coming down to 140

                    and i think Oscar has been through less punishment than Mosley. pac fans would just defend the win by saying "no one made mosley sign the contract, mosley is the one that wanted the fight, it was mosleys fault, blah blah blah"

                    but that was not he real point of me posting that, the point was to show that pacquiao feared mosley....EVEN AT 140, thats just sad.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                      Im not a Pac fan but that is not the logic. The point is he didnt fight Mosley, instead he fought Cotto. Which was hardly some huge step down to imply "ducking". Especially when Cotto holds a victory over Mosley.

                      If thats the case, I wish more people who "duck" Mosley would then fight someone of Cotto's calibre.
                      then this thread is not intended for you, this thread is intended for those pac fans that say Mayweather ducked Mosley but dont care to mention the fact that Mayweather called him out in 06 but Mosley refused. Mayweather then moved up to 154 for the first time to win his 5th division belt fighting the much bigger Oscar adn then beat the guy who took over Tzyus place as the guy who "can beat mayweather", regardless of how overhyped hatton was, you can forget that every one was saying he was the guy to beat Mayweather.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP