PROOF Manny is JUICING!!!!!!

[Allucard]

So if any police checkpoint stops you and does a strip-search on you for no apparent reason, will you agree? With only the probable cause is, you look like a drug user because you are ugly?

Will you agree?

Of course. I'd have no problem with it whatsoever.

[sireeznutz]

It's conclusive alright.

[Marduke]

It was documented and posted here last week... Only referred it was Pacquiao's people who said that. Naturally the *******s ran away from it and the thread faded. Arum commented on it too, very angry.

Documented...

Someone, it could have been ****ing anyone...Hell it could have been YOU, called some newspaper and made up some bull****.

Arum commented on it. Yeah, he said it's a bunch of bull****.

[pacyou]

Floyd Sr. loves cool aid. that's juice.

[cherokee]

*yawn*

you have no proof, like the crackheads and the ****heads, all you have is speculation

[R.M {7}]

the TS has to be the most ******ed poster on this board. I think he should go and kill himself.

[sireeznutz]

He refuses to test randomly. This argument is flawed of course but gold compared to anything *******s have made up because it's actually true, Pacquiao turned down 30 million and tried to negotiate penalties and the chance to keep things quiet if he was caught.

[IMG]http://imagemacros.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/****_head.jpg?w=540&h=720[/IMG]

[Allucard]

Pac is in sex steroids yeah.
Mayweather is just a big Wuss.

A big wuss? Would you have unprotected sex with an hooker who refused to test for any STD? What if she agreed to only test urine? Would you do it? What if this ***** was getting paid 30 million and still refused the test? Wouldn't you get a little, just a little su****ious? No? What if on top of all that the ***** had a friend of a friend asking you about the penalties applicable if you were to be contaminated with some STD and whether you could keep it quiet in that case so this whore wouldn't become burned to the public eye?

[Allucard]

*yawn*

you have no proof, like the crackheads and the ****heads, all you have is speculation

No, idiot, what we have is PLAUSIBLE cause. It demands proof yes. But if the proof is refused by the defendant what do you assume now? Justice gives everyone under su****ion a chance to prove their innocence. IN THE CASE THEY REFUSE, what does a sane unbiased person assume?

It's like finding plaster in Margarito's left wrap and trusting his word there is no plaster on his right wrap, no there is no need to check under it.

[MaD RoBoT]

No, idiot, what we have is PLAUSIBLE cause. It demands proof yes. But if the proof is refused by the defendant what do you assume now? Justice gives everyone under su****ion a chance to prove their innocence. IN THE CASE THEY REFUSE, what does a sane unbiased person assume?

It's like finding plaster in Margarito's left wrap and trusting his word there is no plaster on his right wrap, no there is no need to check under it.

so i should demand the proof that you're gay?