Punching power increasing as you climb in weight?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Headshake
    Up and Comer
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 34
    • 1
    • 0
    • 6,106

    #41
    Originally posted by markkerr101
    i think to an extent yes. but speed is always best power. unless ur george foreman

    AGREE! Speed is key. Like Manny has power but he didn't lose the speed going up in weight. PLUS he is one of the unique fighters with insane leverage when throwing his punches with total commitment, perfect follow-through that adds up a ring to the punch when it hits. Some power punchers is quick too but doesn't have that follow through they either recoils quickly for defense or has lesser leverage so when they fight guys above their weight class it would take a few punch to take its tool.

    Comment

    • Allucard
      Undisputed Champion
      • Jun 2007
      • 5979
      • 393
      • 56
      • 12,399

      #42
      Originally posted by Haglerwins
      Pacquiao is one and I know Tommy Hearns was gettng KO's well above 147. How many others?
      Please don't compare Hearns and Pacquiao. Actually Hearns did maintain a respectful KO ratio when he moved up but it wasn't any better than when he was in the lighter weights. Another factor is that he was a tall dude and that on itself brings allot of leverage (think Paul Williams). Pacquiao is a very short guy who somehow (we now suspect how) managed to not only maintain but increase his power, punching resistance, head size (lol jk), speed and stamina. This is really unheard of. Either a freak of nature or a cheater. It's really that simple. Now Pacquiao never refused to make the freak of nature test...

      Comment

      • Haglerwins
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2006
        • 2528
        • 90
        • 40
        • 9,195

        #43
        I don't want to talk about the negative stuff.

        Comment

        • Left Hook Tua
          VATNIK
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2008
          • 62306
          • 7,010
          • 1,581
          • 951,318

          #44
          Originally posted by Allucard
          Please don't compare Hearns and Pacquiao. Actually Hearns did maintain a respectful KO ratio when he moved up but it wasn't any better than when he was in the lighter weights. Another factor is that he was a tall dude and that on itself brings allot of leverage (think Paul Williams). Pacquiao is a very short guy who somehow (we now suspect how) managed to not only maintain but increase his power, punching resistance, head size (lol jk), speed and stamina. This is really unheard of. Either a freak of nature or a cheater. It's really that simple. Now Pacquiao never refused to make the freak of nature test...
          increase his speed?

          he was fast at flyweight and featherweight.

          increase his power?

          do you know how good his punching power was at flyweight and featherweight?

          increase his stamina?

          because pacquiao had bad stamina in the lower weight classes right?



          ****** post.

          Comment

          • jrosales13
            undisputed champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 32632
            • 739
            • 763
            • 40,023

            #45
            Originally posted by Allucard
            Please don't compare Hearns and Pacquiao. Actually Hearns did maintain a respectful KO ratio when he moved up but it wasn't any better than when he was in the lighter weights. Another factor is that he was a tall dude and that on itself brings allot of leverage (think Paul Williams). Pacquiao is a very short guy who somehow (we now suspect how) managed to not only maintain and increase his power, punching resistance, head size (lol jk), speed and stamina. This is really unheard of. Either a freak of nature or a cheater. It's really that simple. Now Pacquiao never refused to make the freak of nature test...
            Explain what do you mean don't compare Hearns and Pac?

            And, I already gave an example of McClarnin who was basically the same size as Pac. Same height, reach, both were around the flyweight limit as teenagers, and both maintained power, punching resistance, speed, stamina by the time they got to WW. So is not that unheard of. And, McClarnin clearly easily became/is in the top 10 greatest WW of all time. IMO top 5, I actually have him at #3.

            So now my question is was McClarnin a freak of nature or a cheater?

            I will wait for your answer...

            Comment

            • 4773Y350NM3
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Sep 2008
              • 897
              • 13
              • 0
              • 7,035

              #46
              Originally posted by jrosales13
              Explain what do you mean don't compare Hearns and Pac?

              And, I already gave an example of McClarnin who was basically the same size as Pac. Same height, reach, both were around the flyweight limit as teenagers, and both maintained power, punching resistance, speed, stamina by the time they got to WW. So is not that unheard of. And, McClarnin clearly easily became/is in the top 10 greatest WW of all time. IMO top 5, I actually have him at #3.

              So now my question is was McClarnin a freak of nature or a cheater?

              I will wait for your answer...
              And PBF and PAC was 106 at their teen also, so PAC fightin at WW is impossible, but PBF doing it is normal wt**** lol.

              They cant accept the fact, that PAC fought Cotto and PBF wont and he destroyed. They cant believe someone other than PBF could the best in this era lol.

              Comment

              • Doctor_Tenma
                Monster
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2009
                • 33313
                • 1,327
                • 1,249
                • 58,127

                #47
                Originally posted by loui_ludwig
                Remember that Pac at 130 and 135 was 145-148 during fight night. His walking weight(no fights, no training) is reported to be 150 something. So he was cutting weight more than 20 pounds. So when he moved up to 147, he didn't need to lose that much. So when not fighting, Pac has still muscle but gain a lot of fat too. So when he trains now at 147, his losing the fat poundage.
                Doesn't mean much, I can name a bunch of SFW/ LW boxers who rehydrate to 145/148 and didn't find any sucess moving up. They didn't perform better/ their power didn't move up either.

                Comment

                • jrosales13
                  undisputed champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2008
                  • 32632
                  • 739
                  • 763
                  • 40,023

                  #48
                  Originally posted by 4773Y350NM3
                  And PBF and PAC was 106 at their teen also, so PAC fightin at WW is impossible, but PBF doing it is normal wt**** lol.

                  They cant accept the fact, that PAC fought Cotto and PBF wont and he destroyed. They cant believe someone other than PBF could the best in this era lol.
                  God forbid if they give Pac any kind of credit...

                  Comment

                  • SplitSecond
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 23151
                    • 1,715
                    • 1,187
                    • 85,044

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Allucard
                    Please don't compare Hearns and Pacquiao. Actually Hearns did maintain a respectful KO ratio when he moved up but it wasn't any better than when he was in the lighter weights. Another factor is that he was a tall dude and that on itself brings allot of leverage (think Paul Williams). Pacquiao is a very short guy who somehow (we now suspect how) managed to not only maintain but increase his power, punching resistance, head size (lol jk), speed and stamina. This is really unheard of. Either a freak of nature or a cheater. It's really that simple. Now Pacquiao never refused to make the freak of nature test...
                    it's called a proffesional athlete, no cheating required

                    Comment

                    • Doctor_Tenma
                      Monster
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Apr 2009
                      • 33313
                      • 1,327
                      • 1,249
                      • 58,127

                      #50
                      Originally posted by jimmykaba
                      Roberto Duran
                      Good example but that is the only thing that came up with him. He looked like crap against Laing, pretty good against Benitez and surprisingly good against Hagler, then again Hagler was right in front of him. If you gave Duran movement, he'd look like straight up crap. He was real fat and out of shape.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP