"Pacquiao Defamation Suit a Looser for Pacquiao"

[Marduke]

Didn't even read the thread, but can't get over the title.

LOOSER


LOL. Sorry, your entire post is invalidated by your ******ity.

[lynx649]

Do you people realize how childish and immature you look by just posting all these pictures as if they were a legitimate response?

[isidius]

[Guest]

When you ogle any girl, they like it.

They act like they don't sometimes, but they do.

It helps their self-esteem.

[Cash Cow]

Didn't even read the thread, but can't get over the title.

LOOSER


LOL. Sorry, your entire post is invalidated by your ******ity.

simple typo...but if you think that invalidates my posts then who's the ****** one?

[Cash Cow]

Do you people realize how childish and immature you look by just posting all these pictures as if they were a legitimate response?

I mean what I said are all the things that team pac would have to deal with realistically with this lawsuit.

[Guest]

What's your favorite cut of steak?

Filet all day for me.

Porterhouse though is the best of both worlds.

[Cash Cow]

What's your favorite cut of steak?

Filet all day for me.

Porterhouse though is the best of both worlds.

[M.I.C.]

Mayweather Sr's comments weren't even an issue until Pac refused to test, he caused the speculation himself.

[MOREBASS]

I don't see how Pacquiao can prove Floyd Sr. had the intentions to harm him

Defamation per se: Typically, where the statements made by the defendant constitute defamation per se, the defendant has the burden of proving that the allegations are true.

From expertlaw:

Whether a statement is viewed as an expression of fact or opinion can depend upon context - that is, whether or not the person making the statement would be perceived by the community as being in a position to know whether or not it is true

With Floyd Sr being a professional boxing trainer, obviously he would be percieved as someone who has extensive knowledge on the subject.