"But theres no proof"

**Pullcounter** · 12-31-2009, 05:06 AM

do you know what slander and libel is?

**lyricalether** · 12-31-2009, 05:15 AM

Originally posted by Pullcounter

do you know what slander and libel is?

And do you know what a "contradiction" is? or a "lie"?? these are all documented might I add..If Pacquiaos camp goes into a courtroom and these contradictions over the back and forth pull me here pull you there **** over the blood tests, agree then disagree than SUE HIM HIM HIM THEM AND HIM comes up in front of a judge he may even dig himself a deeper hole than he is in now

**Pullcounter** · 12-31-2009, 05:27 AM

Originally posted by lyricalether

And do you know what a "contradiction" is? or a "lie"?? these are all documented might I add..If Pacquiaos camp goes into a courtroom and these contradictions over the back and forth pull me here pull you there **** over the blood tests, agree then disagree than SUE HIM HIM HIM THEM AND HIM comes up in front of a judge he may even dig himself a deeper hole than he is in now

the blood test and what team pac have said about the blood tests have nothing to do with the slander and libel.

team mayweather have made statements that have hurt pac's character and reputation and have cost him future income. this is undisputable.

**shogunn** · 12-31-2009, 05:29 AM

Originally posted by lyricalether

....Thats pacquiao and the *******'s main defense here...My question...if there WAS proof wtf would a test be needed for? Proof meaning scientific evidence that recommends he is using? such as a positive test? What is proof? Proof in the case of a recommended PED test is SU****ION! Was there proof when any one ever tested positive for steroids??

do you think a judge will throw out the NASCs official test results? I dont have to mention they are run by the state, and Manny has passed every single one since he's been tested. Why do I even have to explain this

**hugh grant** · 12-31-2009, 05:50 AM

Originally posted by lyricalether

....Thats pacquiao and the *******'s main defense here...My question...if there WAS proof wtf would a test be needed for? Proof meaning scientific evidence that recommends he is using? such as a positive test? What is proof? Proof in the case of a recommended PED test is SU****ION! Was there proof when any one ever tested positive for steroids??

SO if you are look a bit weird can you be expected to be called a murderer, without proof, just because someone thinks you might look like you are capable of murder.

Achieving great things in boxing is not a good enough reason to be wary of Pac or be su****ious. What incentive would there be for future boxers of attaining success, because if you do become successful people will accuse you? You might as well not strive to achieve anything.

**Killa_Kali** · 12-31-2009, 06:08 AM

here's the full complaint.

http://www.f i g h t n e w s.com/fil...t-pacquiao.pdf

pacquiao filed for per se defamation.

Most jurisdictions also recognize "per se" defamation, where the allegations are presumed to cause damage to the plaintiff. Typically, the following may consititute defamation per se:

Attacks on a person's professional character or standing;

Nevada recognizes per se defamation.

As for Pacquiao being a public figure, his complaint cites the element of malice behind the mayweathers' allegations.

**cherokee** · 12-31-2009, 06:30 AM

FFS, Pac has been tested in all his fights, all negative. he just had a test last November against cotto! and that is negative as well

that may not be the proof you *****s want but that was good enough for NSAC, unless you want to put up your own *****S Athletic Commission

Scientific proof that PAC is roiding? None so far, only the garbage that comes out of the mayweathers big mouth

**southcentralcar** · 12-31-2009, 06:37 AM

Originally posted by hugh grant

SO if you are look a bit weird can you be expected to be called a murderer, without proof, just because someone thinks you might look like you are capable of murder.

Achieving great things in boxing is not a good enough reason to be wary of Pac or be su****ious. What incentive would there be for future boxers of attaining success, because if you do become successful people will accuse you? You might as well not strive to achieve anything.

haha lol.. look, if someone is a suspect in a murder case theres a trial. if theres no evidence the person is released. same here. pac will take the tests if hes clean thats it, all su****ions are cleared and we have a fight

**southcentralcar** · 12-31-2009, 06:39 AM

Originally posted by cherokee

FFS, Pac has been tested in all his fights, all negative. he just had a test last November against cotto! and that is negative as well

that may not be the proof you *****s want but that was good enough for NSAC, unless you want to put up your own *****S Athletic Commission

Scientific proof that PAC is roiding? None so far, only the garbage that comes out of the mayweathers big mouth

wtf ?! if there were proof that he's roiding why would we need any more tests ?! damn did you even read what the guy who created this thread wrote ?

"But theres no proof"