"But theres no proof"

[YoungReezy]

bu, bu, bu, but, there's no proof! here's your proof bitches... :wank:

[hammertorch]

FFS, Pac has been tested in all his fights, all negative. he just had a test last November against cotto! and that is negative as well

that may not be the proof you *****s want but that was good enough for NSAC, unless you want to put up your own *****S Athletic Commission

Scientific proof that PAC is roiding? None so far, only the garbage that comes out of the mayweathers big mouth

Yeah and those *****s believing the crackhead Sr. is far worst than garbage!

[PensionKiller]

And do you know what a "contradiction" is? or a "lie"?? these are all documented might I add..If Pacquiaos camp goes into a courtroom and these contradictions over the back and forth pull me here pull you there **** over the blood tests, agree then disagree than SUE HIM HIM HIM THEM AND HIM comes up in front of a judge he may even dig himself a deeper hole than he is in now

Do these contradictions affect Mayweather's own career? No.

Do the lies affect Pacquaio's career? Perhaps millions.

Can Pac win, I don't know but he has a bigger case than Mayweather

[YoungReezy]

Do these contradictions affect Mayweather's own career? No.

Do the lies affect Pacquaio's career? Perhaps millions.

Can Pac win, I don't know but he has a bigger case than Mayweather

so how much does it cost now a days to call somebody who refuses to take drug tests a roider? Does it depend on who's calling you a roider? Honest question here.

[rommel357]

so how much does it cost now a days to call somebody who refuses to take drug tests a roider? Does it depend on who's calling you a roider? Honest question here.

If you're serious, it depends on who you're accusing and who's being accused. If you accused me, it wouldn't matter that much and i probably wouldn't even be able to get a lawyer because a lawyer wouldn't waste his or her time with my case. They're going to say to me "what image, what reputation", and just laugh at me. I'm sure there are limitations on to what you can call or consider a slander and/or defamation of character. A known "crack addict" probably can't sue somebody for calling him or her a drug addict.