Tall Boxer or Short Boxers?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rampage*
    He who lives, fights.
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2005
    • 3170
    • 389
    • 894
    • 31,407

    #1

    Tall Boxer or Short Boxers?

    I basically just want to know, what gives the greater advantage?
  • akins12732
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Mar 2005
    • 198
    • 8
    • 1
    • 6,488

    #2
    depends if a short is fighting a short or a tall fighting a tall

    Comment

    • Rockin'
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2004
      • 23907
      • 4,461
      • 12,395
      • 1,239,562

      #3
      Baggy boxers, the ladies like them much better than the tighty whities.............Rockin'

      Comment

      • akins12732
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Mar 2005
        • 198
        • 8
        • 1
        • 6,488

        #4
        nice rockin

        Comment

        • buff_mike10
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Dec 2004
          • 387
          • 22
          • 0
          • 6,927

          #5
          the tall guys got the reach advantag, the short guy get to use his legs to punch, and attacks the body better.

          Comment

          • chaawuu
            Contender
            • Feb 2005
            • 103
            • 11
            • 2
            • 6,378

            #6
            short guys hit harder, can work the body easier, and can slip punches easier. if the short guy can't get inside tho he's screwed, the tall guy can just jab him all day.

            Comment

            • jack_the_rippuh
              I to your mom..
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2004
              • 31699
              • 1,148
              • 627
              • 65,521

              #7
              I would rather have a short quick, slick, elusive boxer over a tall rangy fighter any day.

              Comment

              • phallus
                the lizard of ahs
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Sep 2004
                • 12066
                • 4,352
                • 3,349
                • 50,135

                #8
                Originally posted by jack_the_rippuh
                I would rather have a short quick, slick, elusive boxer over a tall rangy fighter any day.


                jack dempsey loved fighting taller guys, he always said they were easier to hit

                Comment

                • GasPed
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Aug 2004
                  • 447
                  • 24
                  • 3
                  • 6,523

                  #9
                  Originally posted by beeatch!
                  jack dempsey loved fighting taller guys, he always said they were easier to hit
                  While Jack Dempsey was a great fighter, I don't think he would've found Lennox Lewis easy to hit.

                  In any weight class but heavy, I think it's a toss up - pros and cons for tall vs short and lots of examples of both kinds of champions.

                  At heavyweight, while there are lots of examples of “short” champions, I get the feeling the bar is being raised. I don’t think we’ll see a 5’10” heavyweight champion ever again. There are just too many skilled guys at 6’2” and over, and since there are no weight restrictions, the 5’10” 220 guy is going to be giving up 10 – 40 pounds in every fight. Not impossible, just really unlikely he could overcome that.

                  Comment

                  • leff
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jun 2004
                    • 5141
                    • 218
                    • 108
                    • 14,047

                    #10
                    Originally posted by GasPed
                    While Jack Dempsey was a great fighter, I don't think he would've found Lennox Lewis easy to hit.

                    In any weight class but heavy, I think it's a toss up - pros and cons for tall vs short and lots of examples of both kinds of champions.

                    At heavyweight, while there are lots of examples of “short” champions, I get the feeling the bar is being raised. I don’t think we’ll see a 5’10” heavyweight champion ever again. There are just too many skilled guys at 6’2” and over, and since there are no weight restrictions, the 5’10” 220 guy is going to be giving up 10 – 40 pounds in every fight. Not impossible, just really unlikely he could overcome that.
                    Agree being shorter is good in all the weightclasses below hw, where the shorter is the stronger.

                    there is possible with another 5.10 heavy, we must just wait for another tyson.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP