I basically just want to know, what gives the greater advantage?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Tall Boxer or Short Boxers?
Collapse
-
-
-
the tall guys got the reach advantag, the short guy get to use his legs to punch, and attacks the body better.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by beeatch!jack dempsey loved fighting taller guys, he always said they were easier to hit
In any weight class but heavy, I think it's a toss up - pros and cons for tall vs short and lots of examples of both kinds of champions.
At heavyweight, while there are lots of examples of “short” champions, I get the feeling the bar is being raised. I don’t think we’ll see a 5’10” heavyweight champion ever again. There are just too many skilled guys at 6’2” and over, and since there are no weight restrictions, the 5’10” 220 guy is going to be giving up 10 – 40 pounds in every fight. Not impossible, just really unlikely he could overcome that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GasPedWhile Jack Dempsey was a great fighter, I don't think he would've found Lennox Lewis easy to hit.
In any weight class but heavy, I think it's a toss up - pros and cons for tall vs short and lots of examples of both kinds of champions.
At heavyweight, while there are lots of examples of “short” champions, I get the feeling the bar is being raised. I don’t think we’ll see a 5’10” heavyweight champion ever again. There are just too many skilled guys at 6’2” and over, and since there are no weight restrictions, the 5’10” 220 guy is going to be giving up 10 – 40 pounds in every fight. Not impossible, just really unlikely he could overcome that.
there is possible with another 5.10 heavy, we must just wait for another tyson.
Comment
Comment