Hypothetical Question Concerning NSAC , USADA , WBO.....

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Left Hook Tua
    VATNIK
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 62306
    • 7,010
    • 1,581
    • 951,318

    #11
    Originally posted by pacman777
    tua i crack up everytime i see your AV
    king hippo was bad ass.

    Comment

    • M.I Truth ?
      Truth Personified
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2006
      • 3204
      • 142
      • 216
      • 9,854

      #12
      Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
      king hippo was bad ass.
      Took me like a hour to figure out how to knock off the manhole taped to his belly on wii.

      Comment

      • The Great Shark
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 3542
        • 295
        • 466
        • 4,021

        #13
        Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
        the thing is though pacquiao passed the nsac tests.

        how can the nsac overturn a fight on the basis of an independent organization's test results?

        i think it would be a mess. (unless they all work the details all out beforehand of course)
        Who's to say the NSAC tests are adequate enough. If he fails the independent tests they can either test him through the NSAC with better methods or retest through the independent organization.

        Comment

        • Left Hook Tua
          VATNIK
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2008
          • 62306
          • 7,010
          • 1,581
          • 951,318

          #14
          Originally posted by M.I Truth ?
          Took me like a hour to figure out how to knock off the manhole taped to his belly on wii.
          never played it on wii.

          i only played the original like 20 years ago.

          my nephew got a wii for x-mas. i'll get him punch out for it.

          Comment

          • Left Hook Tua
            VATNIK
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2008
            • 62306
            • 7,010
            • 1,581
            • 951,318

            #15
            Originally posted by TheGreatShark
            Who's to say the NSAC tests are adequate enough. If he fails the independent tests they can either test him through the NSAC with better methods or retest through the independent organization.
            that's not the question.

            the question is with my hypothetical scenario.

            can/will they retest the same blood that the usada collected?

            re-testing pacquiao after the fact won't mean anything.

            will the pacquiao people challenge the blood that usada presents as evidence?

            Comment

            • The Great Shark
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 3542
              • 295
              • 466
              • 4,021

              #16
              Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
              that's not the question.

              the question is with my hypothetical scenario.

              can/will they retest the same blood that the usada collected?

              re-testing pacquiao after the fact won't mean anything.

              will the pacquiao people challenge the blood that usada presents as evidence?
              Have both test Pacquiao on the same day within the same time period down to the hour, with the same methods. Problem solved.

              Comment

              • Left Hook Tua
                VATNIK
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2008
                • 62306
                • 7,010
                • 1,581
                • 951,318

                #17
                Originally posted by TheGreatShark
                Have both test Pacquiao on the same day within the same time period down to the hour, with the same methods. Problem solved.
                but usada and nsac doesn't do the same testing or have the same method.

                if the nsac will do it the same method/test , what's the need for usada?

                Comment

                • M.I Truth ?
                  Truth Personified
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Nov 2006
                  • 3204
                  • 142
                  • 216
                  • 9,854

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
                  never played it on wii.

                  Qi only played the original like 20 years ago.

                  my nephew got a wii for x-mas. i'll get him punch out for it.
                  I had the original as well. I still recall the passkey to fight tyson right now. The WBO might strip Pac do to the amount of time his license would be suspended and make Floyd the number one contender. Floyds next fight would be for the belt as long as it at 147. Floyd would still have a loss.

                  Comment

                  • The Great Shark
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 3542
                    • 295
                    • 466
                    • 4,021

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
                    but usada and nsac doesn't do the same testing or have the same method.

                    if the nsac will do it the same method/test , what's the need for usada?
                    Thoroughness. That's like using two different waxes and two different methods of applying it to the car. Too many contingencies. It needs to be narrow and to the point. Think of an anonymous poll.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP