Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Mayweather, Golden Boy Hit Back at Pacquiao/Top Rank

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
    actually, that was not a drug screen. That was the standard Hep B and C, and HIV tests that are required by the commission. Usually those would have been done further in advance, but for whatever reason Team Pac waited until 2 weeks out.....
    it was not a damn blood test

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Easy Work View Post
      they didnt have to admit that...WE ALL SEEN THAT...and if he took it 2 weeks before the hatton fight why not take it 2 weeks before the Mayweather fight?
      Keyword...RANDOM.

      Comment


      • #93
        the Pacfans are crazy trying to justify Pacquiao i mean come on be real if Team Pac really wanted to fight Floyd they would say f**k it lets just do the tests unless they had something to hide why else would they say no?? why let something so small stop a fight so big??

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by fabie View Post
          This is really easy that the Mayweather camp cannot simply understand:

          •*The Pacquiao Camp does not conform to the Mayweather procedure that he is demanding a blood test (even if it is for both sides). It is because the Nevada Sports Athletic Commission is the last word that governs everything about the fight.

          Pacquiao have come clean with the NSAC ever since he's been fighting in Nevada and for the Mayweather Camp to demand something like this is not only groundless but ridiculous.

          First of all, "accusing" someone of drug use isn't a ground for the NSAC to test their opponents. And to draw conclusions based on this "accusations" is really downright ridiculous.

          It is like accusing a president without the evidence and grounds for a trial impeachment and yet he is already "guilty" by the accuser and by the people. Mind you all who is supporting Mayweather's demands that Pacquiao declining the blood test (which he didn't but only to the issue of timing in terms of not having it within the same day or very close to the fight night) doesn't equate that he is guilty.

          I am speculating (educational guess) that Pacquiao simply don't want to answer to the whims of Pacquiao because:

          • the fight date is too soon
          • the Mayweather camp are too arrogant to accuse him of illegal supplements
          • that he has come clean all the time from previous fights

          or

          • all of the above

          I think that this might have been a strategy to "coerce" Pacquiao into the fight date while demanding the blood test randomly without the NSAC's intervention.

          Bob Arum, Freddie Roach and Pacquiao agreed that if the NSAC decided to implement such blood testing, that they will abide by it.

          I see a fight by September. More time to promote, and more time to prepare after the Philippine elections.

          My humble opinions.
          Nice one! one of the smartest guy that ive seen in this thread. IF anyone wants an argument with this. Well.. LMAO for them.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by ATL_Boxer View Post
            That doesn't prove he didn't juice in the past. Try again.
            The you tell me how do you find out he did juice in the past?

            You try again.
            Last edited by MindBat; 12-28-2009, 07:23 PM.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by TRUCKIN View Post
              it was not a damn blood test

              Huh? Uhmmmm, Hep B & C and HIV screens are conducted via a BLOOD TEST.

              Having scheduled and reviewed these tests for over 10 years I'm pretty sure I'm right about that. LOL

              Comment


              • #97
                this article aint got a writer?

                its gotta be that ***** lyle fitzsimmons

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by talip bin osman View Post
                  this article aint got a writer?

                  its gotta be that ***** lyle fitzsimmons

                  Well is certainly isnt that ******* Ronnie Nathanielz......lol


                  FYI, it wasnt an article, it was a press release from GBP

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by talip bin osman View Post
                    this article aint got a writer?

                    its gotta be that ***** lyle fitzsimmons
                    hahaha, GOOD ONE!

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by talip bin osman View Post
                      this article aint got a writer?

                      its gotta be that ***** lyle fitzsimmons
                      its a ***** becuz it destroys pacq's actions and refusal to fight a "gayfakecowardducker"?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP