That is exactly what I've been saying. 75-80% of people who purchase PPVs aren't hardcore fans and the world doesn't like cheaters (Not saying Pacquiao is) but because Pacquiao and steroids are constantly in the same sentence (Media, Articles etc)...Pacquiao needs to take the damn test and end it there. He's hurting his image and the lawsuit will make him look worse.
Hate to break it to the tards on this forum, but the general consensus is that Pac...
Collapse
-
-
True, people still think Dempsey used plaster.
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Add to the fact that Roach even said Pacquiao is willing to take whatever test and pass with flying colors.Last edited by Doctor_Tenma; 12-28-2009, 01:50 PM.Comment
-
Mayweather has a history of flaunting the rules in that regard. Pacquiao does not im afraid.Is wrong in this.
And that consensus would be correct. LOL@getting mad about asking for RANDOM tests but wanting to ask the other guy for how much for being over the weight limit (and the other guy accepting).
Manny and Arum the clown have tried to call of this fight THREE times. Floyd has agreed to every condition they have asked.
Don't let facts get in the way of your clownshoe nuthuggery though. Carry on.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I don't doubt that one bit. If anything, this gives Pacquiao more reason to go ahead with that lawsuit against Floyd, Sr.
For people saying that the fact that Floyd Sr. said "In my opinion..." automatically makes him immune, well, you're wrong apparently. I'm no lawyer, but I have google:
Opinions are also not normally considered defamatory because opinions usually don't contain specific facts that can be proven untrue. Merely labeling a statement as your "opinion" does not make it so. Courts look at whether a reasonable reader or listener could understand the statement as asserting a statement of verifiable fact. (A verifiable fact is one capable of being proven true or false.) This is determined in light of the context of the statement. A few courts have said that statements made in the context of an Internet bulletin board or chat room are highly likely to be opinions or hyperbole, but they do look at the remark in context to see if it's likely to be seen as a true, even if controversial, opinion ("I really hate George Lucas' new movie") rather than an assertion of fact dressed up as an opinion ("It's my opinion that Trinity is the hacker who broke into the IRS database").http://www.lawinfo.com/fuseaction/Cl...ategoryid/1162
To me it sounds like Floyd Sr. didn't express a true opinion, but an "assertion of fact dressed up as an opinion."
Sr. said: "In my opinion, he's on steroids." (paraphrasing)
Comment
m/
Comment