Originally posted by shemmue
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hate to break it to the tards on this forum, but the general consensus is that Pac...
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Anton-Chigurh View PostMayweather Jr. KILLED Pacs career.
With one demand.
Pacs legacy is tarnished forever, Him and steroids will always be linked through out history..this story is bigger then any fight Pac has had..its been all over the news.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Spray_resistant View PostEven if everyone in the world thought he was wrong he is a free individual and its his choice to make for whatever reason he does or does not.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lead Cenobite View PostWhat's the principle again? Fear of needles? Fear of being weakened? Floyd is an *******?
Maybe if they hadn't presented 5+ different conflicting excuses as to why not then I could say yes he's a man of principle.Last edited by Doctor_Tenma; 12-28-2009, 01:50 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lead Cenobite View PostIs wrong in this.
And that consensus would be correct. LOL@getting mad about asking for RANDOM tests but wanting to ask the other guy for how much for being over the weight limit (and the other guy accepting).
Manny and Arum the clown have tried to call of this fight THREE times. Floyd has agreed to every condition they have asked.
Don't let facts get in the way of your clownshoe nuthuggery though. Carry on.
Comment
-
-
I don't doubt that one bit. If anything, this gives Pacquiao more reason to go ahead with that lawsuit against Floyd, Sr.
For people saying that the fact that Floyd Sr. said "In my opinion..." automatically makes him immune, well, you're wrong apparently. I'm no lawyer, but I have google:
Opinions are also not normally considered defamatory because opinions usually don't contain specific facts that can be proven untrue. Merely labeling a statement as your "opinion" does not make it so. Courts look at whether a reasonable reader or listener could understand the statement as asserting a statement of verifiable fact. (A verifiable fact is one capable of being proven true or false.) This is determined in light of the context of the statement. A few courts have said that statements made in the context of an Internet bulletin board or chat room are highly likely to be opinions or hyperbole, but they do look at the remark in context to see if it's likely to be seen as a true, even if controversial, opinion ("I really hate George Lucas' new movie") rather than an assertion of fact dressed up as an opinion ("It's my opinion that Trinity is the hacker who broke into the IRS database").http://www.lawinfo.com/fuseaction/Cl...ategoryid/1162
To me it sounds like Floyd Sr. didn't express a true opinion, but an "assertion of fact dressed up as an opinion."
Sr. said: "In my opinion, he's on steroids." (paraphrasing)
Comment
Comment