Hate to break it to the tards on this forum, but the general consensus is that Pac...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Doctor_Tenma
    Monster
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 33313
    • 1,327
    • 1,249
    • 58,127

    #21
    Originally posted by shemmue
    i agree alot of people might say who care's about what the general public thinks.... what boxing fan's think is what counts but they are wrong how do you think ppv fight's do a million plus buy's it because the "general public" buys the fights .....this will hurt pac's career people that don't belive this wait until ppv number come out for pac vs. paulie..
    That is exactly what I've been saying. 75-80% of people who purchase PPVs aren't hardcore fans and the world doesn't like cheaters (Not saying Pacquiao is) but because Pacquiao and steroids are constantly in the same sentence (Media, Articles etc)...Pacquiao needs to take the damn test and end it there. He's hurting his image and the lawsuit will make him look worse.

    Comment

    • $partacus
      I'm SPARTACUS
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2008
      • 4503
      • 248
      • 85
      • 11,373

      #22
      Originally posted by Anton-Chigurh
      Mayweather Jr. KILLED Pacs career.

      With one demand.

      Pacs legacy is tarnished forever, Him and steroids will always be linked through out history..this story is bigger then any fight Pac has had..its been all over the news.
      True, people still think Dempsey used plaster.

      Comment

      • Andrew Cuff V2
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Dec 2009
        • 163
        • 22
        • 22
        • 6,220

        #23
        99% of the forum posters are idiots.

        Comment

        • ROSS CALIFORNIA
          Tyson fan
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2007
          • 69864
          • 997
          • 1,956
          • 113,453

          #24
          Originally posted by Spray_resistant
          Even if everyone in the world thought he was wrong he is a free individual and its his choice to make for whatever reason he does or does not.
          True, but if you risk looking like a steroid user in the proses, you might want to asses your logic.

          Comment

          • Doctor_Tenma
            Monster
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 33313
            • 1,327
            • 1,249
            • 58,127

            #25
            Originally posted by Lead Cenobite
            What's the principle again? Fear of needles? Fear of being weakened? Floyd is an *******?

            Maybe if they hadn't presented 5+ different conflicting excuses as to why not then I could say yes he's a man of principle.
            Add to the fact that Roach even said Pacquiao is willing to take whatever test and pass with flying colors.
            Last edited by Doctor_Tenma; 12-28-2009, 01:50 PM.

            Comment

            • Dirk Diggler UK
              Deleted
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 48836
              • 1,312
              • 693
              • 58,902

              #26
              Originally posted by Lead Cenobite
              Is wrong in this.

              And that consensus would be correct. LOL@getting mad about asking for RANDOM tests but wanting to ask the other guy for how much for being over the weight limit (and the other guy accepting).

              Manny and Arum the clown have tried to call of this fight THREE times. Floyd has agreed to every condition they have asked.

              Don't let facts get in the way of your clownshoe nuthuggery though. Carry on.
              Mayweather has a history of flaunting the rules in that regard. Pacquiao does not im afraid.

              Comment

              • ROSS CALIFORNIA
                Tyson fan
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2007
                • 69864
                • 997
                • 1,956
                • 113,453

                #27
                Originally posted by Andrew Cuff V2
                99% of the forum posters are idiots.
                If you can't agree with 99% of the forum users on this forum, maybe you are the idiot. lol

                Comment

                • Doctor_Tenma
                  Monster
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 33313
                  • 1,327
                  • 1,249
                  • 58,127

                  #28
                  Originally posted by RossCA
                  If you can't agree with 99% of the forum users on this forum, maybe you are the idiot. lol

                  Comment

                  • Bigchill79
                    Interim Champion
                    • Jul 2004
                    • 730
                    • 13
                    • 0
                    • 6,847

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
                    Add to the fact that Roach even said Pacquiao is willing to take whatever test and will pass with flying colors.
                    thats right. Roach had egg on hos face for that one. They're treating the public like idiots.

                    Comment

                    • Maidana vs Rios
                      m/(>.&ltm/
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • May 2009
                      • 3028
                      • 269
                      • 597
                      • 9,602

                      #30
                      I don't doubt that one bit. If anything, this gives Pacquiao more reason to go ahead with that lawsuit against Floyd, Sr.

                      For people saying that the fact that Floyd Sr. said "In my opinion..." automatically makes him immune, well, you're wrong apparently. I'm no lawyer, but I have google:
                      Opinions are also not normally considered defamatory because opinions usually don't contain specific facts that can be proven untrue. Merely labeling a statement as your "opinion" does not make it so. Courts look at whether a reasonable reader or listener could understand the statement as asserting a statement of verifiable fact. (A verifiable fact is one capable of being proven true or false.) This is determined in light of the context of the statement. A few courts have said that statements made in the context of an Internet bulletin board or chat room are highly likely to be opinions or hyperbole, but they do look at the remark in context to see if it's likely to be seen as a true, even if controversial, opinion ("I really hate George Lucas' new movie") rather than an assertion of fact dressed up as an opinion ("It's my opinion that Trinity is the hacker who broke into the IRS database").
                      http://www.lawinfo.com/fuseaction/Cl...ategoryid/1162

                      To me it sounds like Floyd Sr. didn't express a true opinion, but an "assertion of fact dressed up as an opinion."

                      Sr. said: "In my opinion, he's on steroids." (paraphrasing)

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP