Comments Thread For: Top Rank, Golden Boy: Legal Battle For Pacquiao Coming

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jetgeomcx
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 2446
    • 22
    • 112
    • 8,568

    #61
    Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
    he took a huge pr hit.

    schaeffer and mayweather really screwed him up the butt.

    but when all is said and done.....there is still no proof , there is still no evidence.

    we'll see.

    if pac is roiding it'll come out eventually. i hope not.
    steroids and/or hgh i doubt.
    but check out blood-doping or epo....increasing the percentage level of "hematocrit".
    i hope not but there is that probability...

    the mayweathers know about EPO and hematocrit.
    and so floyd insists on "random" blood testing up to the last day before the fyt.
    it is said that it can not be detected in urine.

    one thing is sure...mayweathers know about epo and blood-doping.
    floyd is onto it himself....
    epo can not be detected when one knows the sked of blood tests.
    the only way to detect this is when the test is within 2(?)days of infusion...or very close to it.

    EPO = Erythropoietin

    Comment

    • -Antonio-
      -Antonio-
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2005
      • 24259
      • 629
      • 163
      • 38,153

      #62
      The damage has already been done. The Mayweather's won either way.

      Comment

      • Squabbles94806
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Oct 2008
        • 2408
        • 54
        • 104
        • 2,886

        #63
        Personally, i don't give a fcuk if Pacquiao is on roids. Good. Let him kill everybody in there. If Mayweather was as half as good as he thought he was, then he'd fight Pacquiao even if he were on steroids. Don't you think Floyd's legacy would be re-born? Defeating a man who's pumped full of juice? Even ALI didn't beat a superhuman.

        This whole thing is ******ed. In this "new age", anyone can shoot their mouth off and people will believe them. Especially surrounding a delicate issue such as steroids. To my knowledge, probably 90% of professional athletes are on the juice. What difference does it make? Professional sports wouldn't be where it is today without steroids. It's very dubious to believe a 100% natural athlete can generate the same amount of energy, entertainment, explosivness, and delivery without gettting a little boost. Steroids come in all shapes and sizes; from the extreme example of shooting the drug with a needle, to taking a vitamin pill. It doesn't make any sense to get nutrients, and minerals in a pill form, when you can get the same nutritious value in organic natural whole foods. It really doesn't make any difference to me whether or not athletes are on steroids. I wouldn't do it. But that's just me.

        I think i'm over the Pacquiao vs. Mayweather fight hype. My instincts serve me correct, i knew they were never gonna fight. From the day Floyd came back into the ring it wasn't gonna happen. It's inevitable that this fight would never take place.

        Comment

        • Toxic
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 381
          • 13
          • 1
          • 6,436

          #64
          Originally posted by -Antonio-
          The damage has already been done. The Mayweather's won either way.

          No doubt

          Mayweather demolition team planned this as early as September and waited for the right moment.

          "just a little blood" they say

          "just take the test" they say

          All part of the conspiracy to demolish Pac legacy.
          Last edited by Toxic; 12-28-2009, 10:11 AM.

          Comment

          • Hotbox2
            Contender
            • Feb 2009
            • 333
            • 45
            • 0
            • 6,420

            #65
            This is a ****** article. When asked do you think Manny is taking illegal substances you said no..How do you know he's not? are you his conditioning trainer? do you know about EPO? If James Toney was busted and Roach was the coach and Freddie knew he was on steroids then why would you say NO?

            Comment

            • Go Blue
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2009
              • 1727
              • 73
              • 5
              • 1,981

              #66
              Originally posted by -Antonio-
              The damage has already been done. The Mayweather's won either way.
              Yeah I agree 110%.

              Pac will forever be linked to this steroid stuff.

              Comment

              • angelgargola
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 111
                • 3
                • 0
                • 6,148

                #67
                Shane Mosley never tested positive to performance enhancing drugs,but he addmited taking them.how come he never got caught? You see? there are ways of hidding it. obviously,urine test alone is not enough.So,is this some trick or mind game from FM's team?? i don't think so.Pac knows he's going to test positive if blood tests are taken,that's why he is afraid and won't agree to them.I see that the trick is done 30 days before the fight,there is too much lame excuses to not take the blood tests on that period.

                Comment

                • MindBat
                  floyd gobbler
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jun 2006
                  • 16853
                  • 571
                  • 841
                  • 25,210

                  #68
                  I can understand the defamation suit, but a suit to get complete control of Many Pacquiao's future purses?

                  If I were Oscar, I'd just give up any rights to Pacquiao's stake. All arum needed to do was call and write to Oscar and tell him "I want to have full and complete control of Manny Pacquiao's future purses."

                  Why bother with a suit when GBP's cut is much smaller than Top Rank?

                  Who needs Pacquiao more GBP or Top Rank?

                  Comment

                  • Easy-E
                    Gotta want it
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jul 2005
                    • 22686
                    • 865
                    • 1,739
                    • 32,777

                    #69
                    To be Frank, Manny has no chance in court and is just posturing.
                    Why refuse drug tests, and then bring battles to court, when you could just prove them wrong by taking a drug test?
                    It looks shady.

                    Comment

                    • Boxing Scene
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 7105
                      • 915
                      • 1,705
                      • 29,819

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Easy-E
                      To be Frank, Manny has no chance in court and is just posturing.
                      Why refuse drug tests, and then bring battles to court, when you could just prove them wrong by taking a drug test?
                      It looks shady.
                      You're not a lawyer, but my best friend is, and you don't know ****. He DOES have a case here.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP