Why dont they do Hair testing???

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ray*
    Be safe!!!
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 44867
    • 1,654
    • 1,608
    • 558,890

    #1

    Why dont they do Hair testing???

    Hair drug testing

    Hair drug testing can provide a much longer window of detection, which is useful for highly safety-critical positions where there is zero tolerance of drug usage.[15] Even if the person being tested has a shaved head (perhaps in preparation for the test), hair can also be taken from almost any other area of the body. This includes facial hair, the underarms, arms, and legs.

    It costs more than urine testing, and one must have a lab for results. Hair testing is becoming more reliable as technology advances, and there is no known way to adulterate a hair specimen in order to falsify the results of the test, despite what some retailers advertise.


  • Chups
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2004
    • 18400
    • 1,835
    • 1,281
    • 52,879

    #2
    This is unfair coz Floyd has no hair.



    There's a rumor that Pac's tache is pure steroids.

    Comment

    • VERDUGO
      We are Warriors!
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2005
      • 4746
      • 249
      • 415
      • 13,930

      #3
      LOL

      How the **** is Hair testing gonna affect Pacquiao.
      i think you're missing the point why Floyd is demanding random blood testing on Pac on the day of the fight. ..

      Comment

      • Dondi33O
        Banned
        • Oct 2009
        • 1438
        • 78
        • 19
        • 1,664

        #4
        Originally posted by Ray`
        Hair drug testing

        Hair drug testing can provide a much longer window of detection, which is useful for highly safety-critical positions where there is zero tolerance of drug usage.[15] Even if the person being tested has a shaved head (perhaps in preparation for the test), hair can also be taken from almost any other area of the body. This includes facial hair, the underarms, arms, and legs.

        It costs more than urine testing, and one must have a lab for results. Hair testing is becoming more reliable as technology advances, and there is no known way to adulterate a hair specimen in order to falsify the results of the test, despite what some retailers advertise.


        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drug_te...m_drug_testing
        Maybe its TOO GOOD of an idea. No excuses, no phobias. Money can possibly be lost.

        Comment

        • Akyra
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Sep 2009
          • 11643
          • 357
          • 207
          • 12,259

          #5
          Originally posted by Ray`
          It costs more than urine testing
          there's your answer.

          Comment

          • jrosales13
            undisputed champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 32632
            • 739
            • 763
            • 40,023

            #6
            I asked the same question. And, the answer I got is that the drug EPO can't be detected in a hair sample. It can only be detected in a blood sample

            Comment

            • Bigdaddy_Vh
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Aug 2006
              • 662
              • 17
              • 0
              • 8,340

              #7
              hair testing? is pac suspected of smoking weed???

              Comment

              • Biolink
                Donaire is #1
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Feb 2006
                • 9927
                • 642
                • 2,209
                • 40,170

                #8
                I was always under the impression that taking hair samples was considered more unethical than urine or blood.

                If jobs did drug testing by hair, so many people would fail drug tests

                Comment

                • shabs
                  Banned
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 292
                  • 5
                  • 0
                  • 347

                  #9
                  Originally posted by vErDuGo
                  LOL

                  How the **** is Hair testing gonna affect Pacquiao.
                  i think you're missing the point why Floyd is demanding random blood testing on Pac on the day of the fight. ..


                  lol u fail they are ready comprimized they are offering a cut off date but manny dont want random period sorry y u keep posting lies???

                  Comment

                  • NYU Alum.
                    Banned
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 963
                    • 24
                    • 1
                    • 1,241

                    #10
                    Originally posted by rob_tC
                    there's your answer.
                    Not only that, from my understanding(I could be wrong), it can trace every substance a person has taken, but how would doing the hair test prove that the substance wasn't taken a long time ago ?

                    For example, if someone smoked weed 5 years ago and never smoked again since, it would still show up on the hair test !!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP