Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao on roids or Pacquiao fights bums, over the hill, overrated? Which one is it?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by aether View Post
    deleting a post after it is quoted = ***** move
    Lol, accusing me of deleting a post that will make a poster look like an idiot, yes.

    Believe me, if and when Pacquiao takes another TYPE of drug test not required by any boxing commission just to prove that he will AGAIN come out NEGATIVE, haters will resort back to the bum, overrated, over the hill excuses. You can quote me on that.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Dulcis_Scientia View Post
      I'm confused now. So did pacquiao beat his opponents because of roids or are his past opponents bums, over the hill, overrated? You can't have both ways because if they are bums, over the hill, or overated then there's no need for roids or if he's on roids then delahoya ain't over the hill, diaz ain't a bum, hatton ain't overrated, nor cotto ain't washed up. So which one is it? Clap Clap Clap!


      This post is ownage right here...

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Dulcis_Scientia View Post
        I'm confused now. So did pacquiao beat his opponents because of roids or are his past opponents bums, over the hill, overrated? You can't have both ways because if they are bums, over the hill, or overated then there's no need for roids or if he's on roids then delahoya ain't over the hill, diaz ain't a bum, hatton ain't overrated, nor cotto ain't washed up. So which one is it? Clap Clap Clap!
        Why can't it be both? Maybe Pacquiao wouldn't have even been able to beat bums without roids.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by BadNewz View Post
          Why can't it be both? Maybe Pacquiao wouldn't have even been able to beat bums without roids.
          Maybe pacquiao have beaten great fighters without any drug help. It goes both ways you know. What do you call those fighters again, ah, yes, all time greats.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Dulcis_Scientia View Post
            Lol, accusing me of deleting a post that will make a poster look like an idiot, yes.

            Believe me, if and when Pacquiao takes another TYPE of drug test not required by any boxing commission just to prove that he will AGAIN come out NEGATIVE, haters will resort back to the bum, overrated, over the hill excuses. You can quote me on that.
            i was talking about the other dude...

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by aether View Post
              i was talking about the other dude...
              Lol, my bad, I thought you were referring to me because of your quote.
              Last edited by myCoCainE; 12-26-2009, 03:41 AM.

              Comment


              • #17
                nyahahahaha co sign

                Comment


                • #18
                  This thread is being ducked by haters, lol.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    wow, TS this is ****ing awesome...

                    way to keep the haters in total pawnage...

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      they might say, if pac didnt use steroids, he still get beaten by past prime,over the hill bum boxers.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP