Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lawsuit? How ****** are they?? LOL

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
    This is off topic and you probably answered this already. But, I have a question.

    Nate was so against GBP... And, now he signed with them why?

    Why was he against GBP? And, what made him change his mind?
    It's a longggggggg story, but I'll try to shorten it up.

    Nate was "against" GBP, because their desire to not work with King affected his income. They were successful in keeping every marketable lightweight away from Nate (even though Nate had 3 titles), and just had all their guys keep fighting each other (Casa, Diaz, JMM, Katsidis, etc). And the one offer they made for a possible JMM fight wasnt really a true offer, and would have resulted in Nate being stripped of 2 of his titles due to how far away the proposed date was. Nate felt like they were deliberately freezing him out, which in theory they were.

    However, after what we went through with King after the Guzman mess, and King's inability to provide any fights other than the Funeka mando (I made the Bradley fight with Shaw myself, and gave King a percentage basically just to not interfere with it), Nate started to see that King was the problem, not necessarily GBP. Nobody really wants to do anything with King, because he tries to complicate everything. So Nate kind of came around to the idea that maybe it wasn't all GBP's fault.

    Sure, we dont agree with everything they do, and I doubt we ever will. But that holds true for every promoter in the game. But the bottom line is at this stage of his career, Nate needs to be with who can present him the most opportunities, and at the present time it's GBP.
    Last edited by OnePunch; 12-25-2009, 05:18 AM.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by Splackavellie View Post
      this is the very first hit you get when you search for "nate campbell" on youtube, honest to god:

      I have to agree with the vid title, nate is indeed an idiot.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by kadyo View Post
        I have to agree with the vid title, nate is indeed an idiot.
        So I guess then that you have never made a mistake?

        Must be nice........

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
          It's a longggggggg story, but I'll try to shorten it up.

          Nate was "against" GBP, because their desire to not work with King affected his income. They were successful in keeping every marketable lightweight away from Nate (even though Nate had 3 titles), and just had all their guys keep fighting each other (Casa, Diaz, JMM, Katsidis, etc). And the one offer they made for a possible JMM fight wasnt really a true offer, and would have resulted in Nate being stripped of 2 of his titles due to how far away the proposed date was. Nate felt like they were deliberately freezing him out, which in theory they were.

          However, after what we went through with King after the Guzman mess, and King's inability to provide any fights other than the Funeka mando (I made the Bradley fight with Shaw myself, and gave King a percentage basically just to not interfere with it), Nate started to see that King was the problem, not necessarily GBP. Nobody really wants to do anything with King, because he tries to complicate everything. So Nate kind of came around to the idea that maybe it wasn't all GBP's fault.

          Sure, we dont agree with everything they do, and I doubt we ever will. But that holds true for every promoter in the game. But the bottom line is at this stage of his career, Nate needs to be with who can present him the most opportunities, and at the present time it's GBP.
          Thank you, I was always wondering what was all that about. But, cool I appreciate the info.

          When is Nate going to fight again?

          And, there is a rumor that HBO would want a tournament at 140. Would GBP try to get Nate in that? I know HBO has giving GBP blind dates. So having Nate in the tournament shouldn't be a problem right?

          Or will Nate not be interested to participate.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
            So I guess then that you have never made a mistake?

            Must be nice........
            I made a lot of mistakes but they were never recorded like this one. LOL

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
              So I guess then that you have never made a mistake?

              Must be nice........
              protect yourself at all times

              Comment


              • #87
                “Now, I say to Floyd Mayweather Jr., don’t be a coward and face me in the ring, mano-a-mano and shut your big, pretty mouth, so we can show the world who is the true king of the ring,”

                “Pretty Boy Floyd, face me instead on March 13 in Las Vegas and not in some talk show forum or in press releases written for you by people who don’t even know me. Face me in a fight where I get to punch back. You and your cohorts have accused me of using performance-enhancing drugs. Now, I say, the burden of proof should now come from you, not me,”

                “These people think they are doing the sport a great service. They are not,” added Pacquiao. “To Floyd, despite all these accusations, may your Christmas be merry and I will see you in court, soon, too.”

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by PensionKiller View Post
                  protect yourself at all times
                  I remember mayorga doing the same thing and winky too but at least they were able to get away with their ******ity.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
                    whatever jackass. I went through all this stuff with my attorneys last year after these same allegations were levied against Nate by Willie Savannah.

                    I can tell you right now the case (if its ever filed, which I doubt) wouldnt make it past summary judgement and Pac would have to pay Mayweather and GBP's attorneys fees
                    You are calling them ****** for doing something that you yourself did?

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
                      Thank you, I was always wondering what was all that about. But, cool I appreciate the info.

                      When is Nate going to fight again?

                      And, there is a rumor that HBO would want a tournament at 140. Would GBP try to get Nate in that? I know HBO has giving GBP blind dates. So having Nate in the tournament shouldn't be a problem right?

                      Or will Nate not be interested to participate.
                      The "tournament" thing was blown out of proportion by a few media people. It's not a realistic possibility.

                      As for Nate, there are alot of possibles, but a few things need to get settled in the next week or 2 before we will know anything. We dont want to make any decisions until the Floyd-Pac and Khan-Maidana sagas are settled. Floyd, Khan, and Maidana could all be viable options if they end up available. If they are not available, then Malignaggi or a Bradley rematch become possibilites too. I think the only thing that is certain right now is that King wont be letting Nate get the Devon Alexander fight.......lol

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP