*******S: Give me ONE legitimate reason why Pacquiao shouldn't be tested.

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Great Shark
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 3542
    • 295
    • 466
    • 4,021

    #1

    *******S: Give me ONE legitimate reason why Pacquiao shouldn't be tested.

    ...legitimate is the keyword here *******s. If he has nothing to hide, there should be no problem with random drug testing. Period.
  • bigdognyc
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 194
    • 26
    • 3
    • 380

    #2
    Sure after you give me just one other boxer IN THE HISTORY OF PROFESSIONAL BOXING that was demanded to take the same tests.....

    Comment

    • mrcupide2
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 787
      • 32
      • 68
      • 7,327

      #3
      becuz he is liek SO STRONG and like he has bigger legs than cotto and like...he beat up DLH and like..he can beat up tyson and like...PACQUAIO WARR!!!

      Comment

      • DontHitMyNuts
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Nov 2009
        • 768
        • 38
        • 9
        • 7,200

        #4
        Originally posted by TheGreatShark
        ...legitimate is the keyword here *******s. If he has nothing to hide, there should be no problem with random drug testing. Period.
        floyds team wants testing within 24-48 hours which pac team doesnt want

        pacs team agreed to testing after the fight and before 48 hours of thfight

        why the need for random testing? this is to harass pacquiao plain and simple

        Comment

        • chino727
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Nov 2009
          • 168
          • 3
          • 0
          • 6,220

          #5
          i dont know what youre definition of legitimate is, but he was willing to have the test done but just not 30 days before the fight.the guy is obviously superstitious cuz he actually really believes he lost the first morales fight b/c he had his blood drawn, and yes i do find that a little nutty but to each his own.

          Comment

          • The Great Shark
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 3542
            • 295
            • 466
            • 4,021

            #6
            You can ask for a 10 million per pound penalty but you can't take a blood test?

            Superstition is NOT a legitimate reason, PLEASE TRY AGAIN!

            Comment

            • BawK
              Radioactive Sago Addict
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jul 2009
              • 213
              • 41
              • 14
              • 6,323

              #7
              Do you know what the principle of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth ********* to the US Constitution is? Do you know why Sammy Sosa -- who I think was a HUGE juicer -- refused to submit to sportswriter Rick Reilly's offer to take a drug test to prove he was clean?

              Here's the summary: If Fighter X doesn't have to do something, I shouldn't have to do it, either. It's not enough for Mayweather to say he'll take the blood test, it's about other fighters in the sport not having to take similar blood tests as what is being asked of Pacquiao. It simply isn't fair until and unless ALL fighters are REQUIRED to do the same thing.

              If that were the rule on the books, then I would say "Damn right, Pacquiao had better take the blood test." But it's not, so singling him out for this made-up stipulation isn't fair and won't pass the smell test. It's selective persecution and it reeks of fear and cowardice by Team Mayweather.

              I think that Team Mayweather has finally found a way to pull out of this fight and try to blame it on Manny Pacquiao. I'm extremely upset about this development, but if this is how it goes down, it will be worse than Floyd's obvious ducking of Margarito.

              Comment

              • -EX-
                Trading Block Tycoon
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2006
                • 21258
                • 720
                • 689
                • 32,678

                #8
                If its an excessive amount of blood/urine tests then its ridiculous...

                Comment

                • The Great Shark
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 3542
                  • 295
                  • 466
                  • 4,021

                  #9
                  Originally posted by KLawN
                  Do you know what the principle of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth ********* to the US Constitution is? Do you know why Sammy Sosa -- who I think was a HUGE juicer -- refused to submit to sportswriter Rick Reilly's offer to take a drug test to prove he was clean?

                  Here's the summary: If Fighter X doesn't have to do something, I shouldn't have to do it, either. It's not enough for Mayweather to say he'll take the blood test, it's about other fighters in the sport not having to take similar blood tests as what is being asked of Pacquiao. It simply isn't fair until and unless ALL fighters are REQUIRED to do the same thing.

                  If that were the rule on the books, then I would say "Damn right, Pacquiao had better take the blood test." But it's not, so singling him out for this made-up stipulation isn't fair and won't pass the smell test. It's selective persecution and it reeks of fear and cowardice by Team Mayweather.

                  I think that Team Mayweather has finally found a way to pull out of this fight and try to blame it on Manny Pacquiao. I'm extremely upset about this development, but if this is how it goes down, it will be worse than Floyd's obvious ducking of Margarito.
                  Blah blah blah. Mayweather agrees with ridiculous demands, yet Pacquiao can't handle random drug tests YET ITS MAYWEATHER'S DUCK STILL? You *******s are ****ing delusional. I thought you guys were bad but after this, its straight up ridiculous.

                  Comment

                  • Assault
                    Banned
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 133
                    • 19
                    • 10
                    • 191

                    #10
                    Originally posted by TheGreatShark
                    ...legitimate is the keyword here *******s. If he has nothing to hide, there should be no problem with random drug testing. Period.
                    lame bait thread. pac wants to be tested, but not on the eve of the fight. tests can also be done immediately after the fight.

                    next.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP