*******S: Give me ONE legitimate reason why Pacquiao shouldn't be tested.

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Great Shark
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 3542
    • 295
    • 466
    • 4,021

    #71
    Originally posted by hugh grant
    First PBF explain why he is singling out Pac for this treatment he hasnt given anyone else? He never asked DLH for one, so how is it not just mind games here? Why wasnt it possible that DLH could gain an unfair advantage over PBF? WHy wasnt PBF concerned about DLH?

    Pac has passed every test ever, so dont deserve this su****ion. Dont PBF trust the tests that Pac has had?
    No because his piss was tested twice for each fight and he is only required to get his blood tested once by the commission in order to be able to fight for the YEAR.

    Comment

    • heat27
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2007
      • 5059
      • 174
      • 193
      • 20,131

      #72
      the only legitimate reason is that he is on something

      Comment

      • The Great Shark
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 3542
        • 295
        • 466
        • 4,021

        #73
        Originally posted by PR miguel cotto
        the only legitimate reason is that he is on something
        And there you go. Pacquiao has secrets and could even be on something as we speak. Denying the allegations and negating demands to get his system clean using stall tactics is the only thing I see him doing right now.

        Comment

        • Check
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2008
          • 16585
          • 677
          • 132
          • 26,287

          #74
          What's the name of the girl in your sig?

          Comment

          • Hiram Joel
            As Above, Down Below
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Feb 2009
            • 663
            • 14
            • 7
            • 7,049

            #75
            **** this fight, boxing will move on.

            Comment

            • hugh grant
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2006
              • 30070
              • 2,143
              • 812
              • 105,596

              #76
              Actually i dont mind not seeing the fight now. As long as someone else kicks PBFs ass i dont care.

              Pac will win his 8th title in the next weight class then.

              Comment

              • pnksntdead
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Oct 2004
                • 677
                • 38
                • 3
                • 14,830

                #77
                if bernie madoff were to accuse you of being a thief, without any evidence at all, out of the blue, and insists on going over you things at any day/time that he wants just to make sure that you're innocent, would comply or even take him seriously? would you say yes?

                judging by the photo from your sig., you're not looking for legitimate reasons but rather out there to stir up further controversy.

                since when is a person guilty until proven innocent? i think you were born in the wrong era, you're more fit to be participating in in witch hunts and lynching.

                Comment

                • Chups
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2004
                  • 18402
                  • 1,835
                  • 1,281
                  • 52,879

                  #78
                  Coz he's clean?

                  10 NSAC testing says so.

                  Comment

                  • Reservation
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 161
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    • 6,233

                    #79
                    Originally posted by pnksntdead
                    if bernie madoff were to accuse you of being a thief, without any evidence at all, out of the blue, and insists on going over you things at any day/time that he wants just to make sure that you're innocent, would comply or even take him seriously? would you say yes?

                    judging by the photo from your sig., you're not looking for legitimate reasons but rather out there to stir up further controversy.

                    since when is a person guilty until proven innocent? i think you were born in the wrong era, you're more fit to be participating in in witch hunts and lynching.
                    This is what I've been saying all along. I even made a similar comparison (Salem Witch trials).

                    Comment

                    • The Great Shark
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 3542
                      • 295
                      • 466
                      • 4,021

                      #80
                      Originally posted by Chups
                      Coz he's clean?

                      10 NSAC testing says so.
                      10 NSAC PISS tests say so.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP