Does it bother you that Pacquiao never gave Marquez the rematch for a Trilogy?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Black Zombie
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 179
    • 5
    • 19
    • 264

    #1

    Does it bother you that Pacquiao never gave Marquez the rematch for a Trilogy?

    I feel that the draw was somewhat deserving in the first fight, even though Marquez outboxed Pacquiao most of the rounds....

    But we all know the second fight could have went either way, and Marquez seemed to have deserved the decision, but Pacquiao did get the knockdown...


    With that said, the perfect way to top this off would have been a 3rd fight which would have definitely shed a light on who is considered to be the true victor in the rivalry...because as of right now, we can't say that Pacqiao would have won the third fight, and we can't say that Marquez would have won the third fight....

    Now, a third fight wouldn't even be the same....
    76
    No, Pacquiao dominated and proved his point
    18.42%
    14
    Yes, I felt Marquez deserved the win in both, or at least deserved a Trilogy
    44.74%
    34
    There was no need for a 3rd fight
    25.00%
    19
    Pacquiao didn't want the trouble of going life and death anymore...
    11.84%
    9
  • billionaire
    Banned
    • Jul 2008
    • 1930
    • 160
    • 90
    • 2,411

    #2
    ***quez needs pac more than pac needs him.....they will fight a 3rd time if pac loses to may and he kos hatton....then pac will retire...

    Comment

    • Chups
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2004
      • 18402
      • 1,835
      • 1,281
      • 52,879

      #3
      Not really.......Pac gave Marquez 2 chances and Marquez blew those chances. Unless Pac loses, he won't get another shot.

      Comment

      • BOLLOCKS
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2006
        • 36266
        • 1,401
        • 1,537
        • 58,925

        #4
        No, I don't like the both of them, so it's a lose/lose fight for me.

        Comment

        • [ DUBBZZ ]
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2009
          • 6715
          • 723
          • 167
          • 33,826

          #5
          Originally posted by Black Zombie
          I feel that the draw was somewhat deserving in the first fight, even though Marquez outboxed Pacquiao most of the rounds....

          But we all know the second fight could have went either way, and Marquez seemed to have deserved the decision, but Pacquiao did get the knockdown...


          With that said, the perfect way to top this off would have been a 3rd fight which would have definitely shed a light on who is considered to be the true victor in the rivalry...because as of right now, we can't say that Pacqiao would have won the third fight, and we can't say that Marquez would have won the third fight....

          Now, a third fight wouldn't even be the same....
          I'd love to see that. I don't think JMM would be as effective at 147 but it would be very entertaining. I'd say Pac KO in the 10th.

          Comment

          • BOLLOCKS
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2006
            • 36266
            • 1,401
            • 1,537
            • 58,925

            #6
            Originally posted by Chups
            Not really.......Pac gave Marquez 2 chances and Marquez blew those chances. Unless Pac loses, he won't get another shot.
            The two Mayweather students will face each other in Manila.

            Comment

            • ThePunchingBag
              Rolling with the punches.
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 5766
              • 192
              • 55
              • 12,300

              #7
              Marquez lost to Mayweather in a sad joke of a fight. No point of a 3rd match when Pac basically won the first 2*.

              *the draw was scored wrong by the judge in the first fight. He admitted Pacquiao should've won if he had scored the first round correctly.

              Comment

              • S A M U R A I
                Bulletproof
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2008
                • 181694
                • 1,495
                • 1,324
                • 1,419,318

                #8
                Does it bother me? No. The first fight I had Pacquiao winning. The second fight, at first I had Marquez slightly ahead. On a second and third viewing, I had it the other way. A 3rd fight would be nice, but I don't feel it's fair to take Marquez over 140 because he's out of his depth. However, if he agreed to it, that's his own fault. At 140+, I don't give him much of a chance against Pacquiao, I don't think a KO is unlikely.



                100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

                Comment

                • YoungReezy
                  Banned
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 777
                  • 179
                  • 88
                  • 1,030

                  #9
                  Pac lost twice against JMM, so he doesn't want a 3rd ass whooping!

                  Comment

                  • PinoyZoi
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2009
                    • 4262
                    • 249
                    • 267
                    • 10,829

                    #10
                    Didn't Marquez turned down a fight with Pacquiao to fight with Chris John and than lost to Chris John?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP