Itd be like saying...Cotto beat Mosley, Marg knocked out Cotto, so Marg should knock out Mosley.
It doesnt work.
nope, i dont believe in boxing math either but what you need to understand is its very reasonable to believe that pac can KO floyd after what he's been doing lately (ie. KOing, TKOing, retiring great fighters).
its not *******ed at all. unless u say "FOR SURE pac will KO floyd and floyd will be a helpless little girl FOR SURE!"
nope, i dont believe in boxing math either but what you need to understand is its very reasonable to believe that pac can KO floyd after what he's been doing lately (ie. KOing, TKOing, retiring great fighters).
its not *******ed at all. unless u say "FOR SURE pac will KO floyd and floyd will be a helpless little girl FOR SURE!"
What I am saying is that it is NOT logical to say that Pac will beat Floyd becasue he beat Hatton and DLH in more convincing fashion. that is a stylistic issue.
But I understand your point.
What I am saying is that it is NOT logical to say that Pac will beat Floyd becasue he beat Hatton and DLH in more convincing fashion. that is a stylistic issue.
But I understand your point.
The difference between: Manny has looked excellent latley, stopping very good fighters in domination fashion and has had no issues coming up in weight.
as opposed to Manny KO'd Hatton fasted than Floyd who struggled with him and Floyd got an SD against Oscar while Manny dominated, Manny is clearly better and will beat Floyd.
Nope, you don't know anything about boxing because you're a fan of only one boxer. You= Failure! You should floss your teeth to try and get that white goey floyd stuff out of your teeth.
*******s are intellectual flyweight midgets. Instead of discussing boxing you make sexual references. I'm a boxingfan first and foremost and I respect the hard work and accomplishments of every fighter who steps in the ring.
I'll repost my response again and bold out the important points since you failed to identify. More than likely,like most Pak-Yao fans, you've never seen those fights.
know you just started watching boxing when Pac got famous, but you need to tell that to all the other *******s. Just because Pac destroyed hatton, cotto, and Oscar doesn't mean he'll do it with Mayweather. Same as how Felix Trinidad (do you and other *******s know who that is?) destroyed other middleweight fighters Hopkins struggled with. You know the result of Hopkins V Trinidad. Same with Ali v Foreman and Hopkins v Pavlik. Roach understands this but idiotic *******s don't.
You don't know **** about boxing.
What about how devistating Foreman was destroying Ali's opponents?? Same with Trinidad and Pavlik(he's recent so maybe *******s seen the name on NSB; they don't watch other fighters)?? Discuss
Triangels theory dont always work. Just cos Pac destroyed DLH and Hatton better than PBF did, dont mean Pac will destroy PBF.
So PBF fans dont need to get sensitive and say things like PBF beat Hatton first, and DLH was weight drained and past it excuses then do they? Just take comfort in the fact just cos pac destroyed dlh and hatton dont mean he would destroy floyd. Be comfortable in your own self im saying and dont need to try belittle Pacs wins.
Comment