Where would you rank Vitali Klitschko among the ATG heavyweights?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Earl-Hickey
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 29031
    • 2,832
    • 1,384
    • 297,750

    #21
    Yeah, Vitalis problem is that this is a truly awful era, I mean Lewis fought in an average era, but this is a terrible era, so he hasn't had anyone except from an old lewis to test himself against.

    Comment

    • StarshipTrooper
      Anti-Fascist, Anti-Bigot
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2007
      • 17917
      • 1,180
      • 1,344
      • 26,849

      #22
      For the record, if they weren't brothers Vitali KOs Wlad in less than 5.

      Poet

      Comment

      • The Hammer
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 50797
        • 3,416
        • 8,704
        • 58,851

        #23
        I don't think the Klitschkos will ever receive the recognition they deserve.

        The so-called "experts" like Raskin, Farhood, Kellerman etc. will say it's a bad era, like they discredit the Marciano era. But really, it's no worse or better than the other heavyweight eras.

        Comment

        • dans
          Journeyman
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2006
          • 6835
          • 212
          • 134
          • 13,712

          #24
          I voted top 15. I can't bring myself to put him above guys like Lennox Lewis and Larry Holmes that were the Undisputed HW champ and ruled for years. Still Vitali is definitely a ATG and top 15 isn't bad at all considering the injuries he's endured and the 4 year period of inactivity.

          Comment

          • Spray_resistant
            Edgelord Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2009
            • 29159
            • 2,702
            • 1,439
            • 53,384

            #25
            I voted top 5 because he doesn't have the best opponents but I think he could have potentially have beaten any of the ATGs prime for prime.

            Comment

            • The_Demon
              Big dog
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2009
              • 13603
              • 1,354
              • 888
              • 22,971

              #26
              Originally posted by Carnivore
              I don't think the Klitschkos will ever receive the recognition they deserve.

              The so-called "experts" like Raskin, Farhood, Kellerman etc. will say it's a bad era, like they discredit the Marciano era. But really, it's no worse or better than the other heavyweight eras.
              its the worse its ever been,thats the opinion of 99% of boxing fans

              Comment

              • Spray_resistant
                Edgelord Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 29159
                • 2,702
                • 1,439
                • 53,384

                #27
                Originally posted by british_fan
                its the worse its ever been,thats the opinion of 99% of boxing fans
                Because 99% of current boxing fans have been alive to watch every era of HW boxing great point.....its the same as always, just a few fighters who are head and shoulders above the rest. It has always been that way but the myth is constantly perpetuated that there were these "golden eras" where a dozen great HWs were actively competing at one time.

                Comment

                • The Hammer
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 50797
                  • 3,416
                  • 8,704
                  • 58,851

                  #28
                  Originally posted by british_fan
                  its the worse its ever been,thats the opinion of 99% of boxing fans
                  Probably closer to 90%.

                  That's because 90% of people believe whatever the man on TV (Kellerman, Atlas, Bernstein) tells them.

                  Throughout history, 90% of people have been peasants who couldn't think for themselves.

                  The division is about the same as it always was. Tony Galento was worse than Arreola.

                  Comment

                  • gingeralbino
                    WAR MAGEE!!!
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 7999
                    • 224
                    • 388
                    • 20,405

                    #29
                    Originally posted by british_fan
                    its the worse its ever been,thats the opinion of 99% of boxing fans
                    Tyson's era was just as bad imo.

                    Comment

                    • True Guru
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jun 2009
                      • 1648
                      • 138
                      • 0
                      • 1,845

                      #30
                      Originally posted by gingeralbino
                      Tyson's era was just as bad imo.
                      Yep
                      Holmes was better than everyone aswell,it wasnt great then.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP