Why did Holyfield lose to Moorer then was able to beat Tyson?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Super_Lightweight
    Jesus of Nazareth P4P
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2005
    • 7746
    • 452
    • 556
    • 15,482

    #1

    Why did Holyfield lose to Moorer then was able to beat Tyson?

    There were reports he ha da heart problem, but how would that just go away? There are also reports that he had a left shoulder problem vs Moorer, but does anyone know what it was specifically?

    I know he got tired quick vs Moorer but it was still a close fight.
  • puppy_dogg
    1053R
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2004
    • 3825
    • 192
    • 374
    • 10,686

    #2
    he was so damn muscular, it looked like he had lifted weights for that fight. that could have affected his stamina

    Comment

    • jack_the_rippuh
      I to your mom..
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2004
      • 31700
      • 1,148
      • 627
      • 65,521

      #3
      Didn't he go to Benny Hinn or something?

      Comment

      • legend
        Bareknuckle Champ
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Apr 2005
        • 714
        • 52
        • 33
        • 7,127

        #4
        Moorer used to be pretty damn good.

        Comment

        • SacTown1
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2004
          • 1915
          • 84
          • 0
          • 8,399

          #5
          Styles make fights, Moorer is a flat-footed, counter-punching southpaw with a great jab and quick fists....Tyson was a short, bull-rushing righty who threw telegraphed punches....Holyfield's style was built to beat Tyson, but Moorer's style was crafted to outbox Holyfield and build points

          Comment

          • Ptownz_fynestz
            Up and Comer
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Jun 2004
            • 92
            • 7
            • 0
            • 6,155

            #6
            cause he was more focused and the pressure

            Comment

            • scap
              Boxingscene's *****
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2004
              • 7226
              • 385
              • 1
              • 17,023

              #7
              Originally posted by jack_the_rippuh
              Didn't he go to Benny Hinn or something?

              Way to be astute Jack, your right he did go to see big bad benny hinn and good old benny sealed that hole in his heart with a wave of his hand!

              So the reason why he beat Tyson is simple....

              BENNY HINN

              Comment

              • Super_Lightweight
                Jesus of Nazareth P4P
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2005
                • 7746
                • 452
                • 556
                • 15,482

                #8
                hmm

                Styles make fights, Moorer is a flat-footed, counter-punching southpaw with a great jab and quick fists....Tyson was a short, bull-rushing righty who threw telegraphed punches....Holyfield's style was built to beat Tyson, but Moorer's style was crafted to outbox Holyfield and build points
                Yeah I know, but Holyfield looked much better in general vs Tyson. He looked more fit and threw more punches. Holyfield has success vs Moorer when he threw but did not throw often.

                I think the real Holyfield perhaps showed in the rematch vs Mooorer.

                Comment

                • scap
                  Boxingscene's *****
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Aug 2004
                  • 7226
                  • 385
                  • 1
                  • 17,023

                  #9
                  when you fight a guy like Tyson who comes after you over and over again you have little choice but to fight at a high pace and eventually knock him out.

                  Moorer was much more of a plodder and therfore he changed the entire way the fight was to unfold...

                  You have heard it a thousand times...styles make fights, most times it is just that simple.

                  Comment

                  • kapersky
                    *****istrator
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Mar 2005
                    • 753
                    • 28
                    • 1
                    • 7,290

                    #10
                    because moorer was better, moorer was in his prime and he also was great boxer. tyson was done, he fought bums that couldnt take punches and hit back. then holyfield who could take and hit back

                    EDIT: and then rematch tyson was better trained, he showed speed and power in round 3, could be a intresting fight if tyson didnt bited holyfield.
                    Last edited by kapersky; 04-22-2005, 01:29 PM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP