Amir Khan can beat Bradley, no problems.

[Wreckless]

If this fight happens, I got all my points on Khan.

[sammiza567]

everyone picking khan can save your breath b/c there isnt the slightest chance in hell khan's people would give him bradley at this stage in his career. besides the fact that i KNOW khan would get mauled by tim, it doesnt matter. the fight wont happen.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Fights are won on more than just power, lads

[the_ilest]

no way in hell is khan going to beat tim. the only way i see khan winning is by head butting like what he did to barrera.

[Check]

Fights are won on more than just power, lads

Everyone is just correcting the thread starter about the power comparison.

[Roxas]

lmao "hits harder then holt"

[PittyPat]

no way in hell is khan going to beat tim. the only way i see khan winning is by head butting like what he did to barrera.

In which case, it could be a very painful night for both men - Bradley (albeit accidently) lunged his head at Campbell's like a missile.

I'll probably be in the minority with this one, but I really don't think it's a crazy notion at all that Khan could beat Bradley. I wouldn't say it's pick-'em, but not foregone either.

[ItaZY]

no way holt was way more difficult for bradley than khan would be. holts would smash khan too. Holts a beast

[tnf1400]

Khan has a lot of skills, but he has a lot to prove. He just won a belt from a terrible fighter and had one defense against another terrible fighter. I wouldn't put him in there with any 140lb fighter who can punch yet.

[PittyPat]

He just won a belt from a terrible fighter

Kotelnik was a weak beltholder, but certainly not "terrible" as you put it. He had (albeit a questionable) win over Maidana, who everyone wants Khan to face. That's Maidana's only loss. Kotelnik ****** with him.

"Terrible", in boxing terms, is most likely someone with a huge loss-win ratio and no KO power. Kotelnik was neither, and had a recognisable belt - what was Khan supposed to do? Tell his promoters "No, I'll pass and fight another stiff instead"? Please.

one defense against another terrible fighter.

Again, as weak as Salita looked on the night and in a few past encounters, he was Khan's mandatory and was undefeated. I'll repeat - what was Khan supposed to do? Tell his promoters "No, I'll drop this belt I've just won and fight another stiff instead"? Give me a break already.

I wouldn't put him in there with any 140lb fighter who can punch yet.

Oh for fuck's sake, now you're really not making any sense. So first he fights a "terrible" Kotelnik, then a "terrible" Salita, and now when he actually expresses a desire to step up to the world-class punchers in the division, you're telling us he shouldn't do so? He should fight more stiffs in the UK and keep getting flack for not stepping up, right?

Make up your mind.