Stop Acting Like Pac Never Cherry Picks

[BOLLOCKS]

The Pacman's List of Specially Cherry-Picked Opponents:
1) Juan Manuel Marquez
2) Oscar De La Hoya
3) Ricky Hatton
4) Miguel Cotto
5) Marco Antonio Barrera
6) David Diaz
7) Jorge Solis
8) Erik Morales
9) Oscar Larios
10) Hector Velazquez
11) Floyd Mayweather Jr.
12) Etc., Etc...

Only one African American, he'll end Pacquiao's career by schooling him.

[CrackYourJaw]

Erik's a legend.

[Foodie One]

Only one African American, he'll end Pacquiao by schooling him.

Hahaha... You're so silly Richey. Ya, he'll probably school the Pacman in the proper way to run around in a 20 foot boxing ring.

[fdotorres]

Only one African American, he'll end Pacquiao's career by schooling him.

so you're just one of those fools with the chip on your shoulder? now i understand where all your anger comes from, but stop being ridiculous

don't worry though, the world will always consider pacquiao a greater fighter than mayweather

[Calilloyd]

The Pac-Morales rematch was already claused in the 1st fight and was a sure thing before Morales lost to Raheem.

David Diaz is arguably the BEST lightweight at the time. He knocked out Santa Cruz who was outright robbed of a victory against linear champion Cassamayor and was flat out ducked by Juan Diaz despite being on the same card to help push a unification bout.

People keep bitching about Cotto because he had lost 2 fights prior to Margarito but completely ignore the fact that Mosley had lost 2 fights prior Cotto so either way you'd be saying the same ****.

That's straight bull****. No objective person would;d even argue that Diaz was the best at 135 at the time. That's just silly. And Casamayor was past his prime for a while. I also get tired of that lineal champion BS getting thrown around as if it represents the best fighters. It doesn't

[fdotorres]

I'm sure Manny beats Bradley, but you have to admit out of everyone at 140, Bradley has a better chance against Manny.

he has no chance against manny IMO. he'd last more than any other 140 pounder against him no doubt, but his style doesn't present any problems to pacquiao. he isn't a good counter puncher nor a slick, defensive fighter

[pactard99]

Or rather most of them were the ones who Cherry picked on PAC because they thought PAC was an easy assignment. Like DLH, a lot of critics before the fight said DLH was a bully for picking on PAC as his opponent. That lame DLH cherry picker

[hypodermical]

i dont get it..

so pac schooled and toyed with david diaz.. so hypothetically speaking juan diaz or any other 135 elite would beat pac?

pac KTFOd hatton in 2 rounds.. so hypothetically speaking he'd have a tougher time with the other elite 140s ?

ODLH looked like a statue/punching bag against pacquiao when everyone was saying he was gonna kill pac, knowing that it will be at 147, so hypothetically speaking, ODLH wouldve beat him if it was at 154?

he destroyed cotto, made him run for his life and rearranged his face at 145, a bunch of people here swore that cotto will end his career knowing that itll be at 145, so hypothetically speaking, pac wouldve lost to cotto at 147(146) or has no chance against mosley (who cotto beat)??

is this rational at all??

[hugh grant]

I think the thing is just because Roach puts his foot in it sometimes and says how Pac will beat so and so and that they will be easy for Pac, people take that as roach having cherry picked opponents for Pac, which is ludicrous really isnt it?

For example when Roach said DLH cant pull the trigger now, does not mean you can take artistic free license to make out Roach means anyone could beat DLH because he couldnt pull the trigger.

Just becuase Roach didnt think Hatton was all that great, doesnt mean to say hatton couldnt beat the rest of the competion. Its just roach didnt think Hatton was good enough to beat Pac. Hatton was good enough to beat eveyrone else though.

[fdotorres]

i dont get it..

so pac schooled and toyed with david diaz.. so hypothetically speaking juan diaz or any other 135 elite would beat pac?

pac KTFOd hatton in 2 rounds.. so hypothetically speaking he'd have a tougher time with the other elite 140s ?

ODLH looked like a statue/punching bag against pacquiao when everyone was saying he was gonna kill pac, knowing that it will be at 147, so hypothetically speaking, ODLH wouldve beat him if it was at 154?

he destroyed cotto, made him run for his life and rearranged his face at 145, a bunch of people here swore that cotto will end his career knowing that itll be at 145, so hypothetically speaking, pac wouldve lost to cotto at 147(146) or has no chance against mosley (who cotto beat)??

is this rational at all??

i agree with you on all points, except the last one

i always said that the cotto fight was 50/50, but i ALWAYS knew that mosley would've given pac a much tougher fight than cotto

is it cherry picking? no, because cotto was the 2nd best WW and no easy task, but pac would never do to mosley what he did to cotto