Stop Acting Like Pac Never Cherry Picks

**civicvx** · 12-12-2009, 04:47 PM

Originally posted by Young Know

Pac's done his share of Cherry picking, moving up to lightweight fighting the worst paper champ, instead of fighting JMM again. Fighting Morales after he lost to Raheem at 135, and forcing Morales to go back down to 130, when the main reason he went up to 135 in the first place was because he was having trouble making 130. Then Fighting Cotto at 145 instead of Mosley, even after Mosley said he'd go all the way down to 140 to fight him. Nah, he knew Cotto's chin and stamina made him the easier fighter for him. Roach is a great matchmaker, but a overrated trainer, and so is Pacquiao. Mayweather will school him silly and retire him.

It's only cherry picking when you keep fighting the worser and worser opponent. Diaz was not the best champion at 135 but Pac came back was a bomb in taking on Dela Hoya. Don't give any excuse about how Dela Hoya is drained this and drained that. Pacquiao siging to fight Dela Hoya alone is a death wish. That alone erased the Diaz fight. To top it off Pacquiao than took on Hatton afterward.

**Doctor_Tenma** · 12-12-2009, 04:50 PM

Everyone has done their share of cherry picking.

**shadeyfizzle** · 12-12-2009, 04:55 PM

The Pac-Morales rematch was already claused in the 1st fight and was a sure thing before Morales lost to Raheem.

David Diaz is arguably the BEST lightweight at the time. He knocked out Santa Cruz who was outright robbed of a victory against linear champion Cassamayor and was flat out ducked by Juan Diaz despite being on the same card to help push a unification bout.

People keep bitching about Cotto because he had lost 2 fights prior to Margarito but completely ignore the fact that Mosley had lost 2 fights prior Cotto so either way you'd be saying the same ****.

**PACbeatFLOYD** · 12-12-2009, 04:56 PM

How about cotton picker!!!

**BOLLOCKS** · 12-12-2009, 04:58 PM

Originally posted by shadeyfizzle

The Pac-Morales rematch was already claused in the 1st fight and was a sure thing before Morales lost to Raheem.

David Diaz is arguably the BEST lightweight at the time. He knocked out Santa Cruz who was outright robbed of a victory against linear champion Cassamayor and was flat out ducked by Juan Diaz despite being on the same card to help push a unification bout.

People keep bitching about Cotto because he had lost 2 fights prior to Margarito but completely ignore the fact that Mosley had lost 2 fights prior Cotto so either way you'd be saying the same ****.

Santa Cruz was schooling Diaz until he got very lucky late in the fight.

**Doctor_Tenma** · 12-12-2009, 04:59 PM

Originally posted by shadeyfizzle

The Pac-Morales rematch was already claused in the 1st fight and was a sure thing before Morales lost to Raheem.

David Diaz is arguably the BEST lightweight at the time. He knocked out Santa Cruz who was outright robbed of a victory against linear champion Cassamayor and was flat out ducked by Juan Diaz despite being on the same card to help push a unification bout.

People keep bitching about Cotto because he had lost 2 fights prior to Margarito but completely ignore the fact that Mosley had lost 2 fights prior Cotto so either way you'd be saying the same ****.

Casamayor didn't take him serious, didn't train at all. David Diaz ain't **** though.

**shadeyfizzle** · 12-12-2009, 05:00 PM

Originally posted by Young Know

Santa Cruz was schooling Diaz until he got very lucky late in the fight.

Mayorga was schooling Mosley until he got very lucky in literally last second of the fight.

**shadeyfizzle** · 12-12-2009, 05:02 PM

Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!

Casamayor didn't take him serious, didn't train at all. David Diaz ain't **** though.

Dude would fcuk Juan Diaz's **** up.

**Godsent** · 12-12-2009, 05:04 PM

Yeah pacquiao cherry picks too like PBF... just like in his last fight he picked a BIG ASS CHERRY!

Stop Acting Like Pac Never Cherry Picks