i don't like froch more than the next guy. he was getting schooled by dirrell and got some warm hometowncooking in the decision. and he was losing that taylor fight until taylor gassed out. he got the knockout though so you can't take anything away from him for that. froch is a brawler-puncher but not the most skilled fighter. khan has the speed and power and looks alot more flashy in the ring. he also has the big name trainer so it's no wonder that he gets more attention. he seems to have that british wit/attitude that can be offputting to some americans, see his interview after the dirrell fight. all this said, if froch gets asked a question he's going to give his opinion, nothing wrong with that. not like the two will ever fight so theres no need to be diplomatic about it. i hope kessler woops froch and redeems himself from that ward fight though.
Comments Thread For: Carl Froch Discusses His Side of The "Amir Khan Feud"
Collapse
-
Nevermind, he hadn't even turned pro yet.Comment
-
I am a fan of both boxers, but Froch is speaking the truth here.Comment
-
What on earth are you talking about? Because we haven't heard of a boxer we shouldn't underestimate them, well boxers have resumes which we can use to get an insight into how well they may do. Before Froch fought Taylor he had beaten decent boxers on the domestic and international stage and had a high KO percentage to boot. Salita on the other hand has pillows for fists and had beaten no-one of note, while drawing to a journeyman. It is perfectly reasonable to question Salita's position as a mandatory and the fight being on PPV.
I am a fan of both boxers, but Froch is speaking the truth here.Comment
-
What on earth are you talking about? Because we haven't heard of a boxer we shouldn't underestimate them, well boxers have resumes which we can use to get an insight into how well they may do. Before Froch fought Taylor he had beaten decent boxers on the domestic and international stage and had a high KO percentage to boot. Salita on the other hand has pillows for fists and had beaten no-one of note, while drawing to a journeyman. It is perfectly reasonable to question Salita's position as a mandatory and the fight being on PPV.
I am a fan of both boxers, but Froch is speaking the truth here.Comment
-
What on earth are you talking about? Because we haven't heard of a boxer we shouldn't underestimate them, well boxers have resumes which we can use to get an insight into how well they may do. Before Froch fought Taylor he had beaten decent boxers on the domestic and international stage and had a high KO percentage to boot. Salita on the other hand has pillows for fists and had beaten no-one of note, while drawing to a journeyman. It is perfectly reasonable to question Salita's position as a mandatory and the fight being on PPV.
I am a fan of both boxers, but Froch is speaking the truth here.Comment
-
Comment
-
Froch is a hater, he was taking shots at Calzaghe when he was Commonwealth Champion and knocking over tomato cans. He can't just worry about himself, he's always gotta hate on someone else. I'm dying for someone to knock him out and I'm English, he got schooled for 11 and a half rounds by a shot Taylor and acts like he's King Jaffy Joffa.Comment
-
[QUOTE=02bash;6922478]exactly carl froch wasnt a known fighter and he beat taylor, so you shouldn't underestimate anyone, and salita is a mandatory. thanks for helping me prove my point more.[/QUOTEC
Cry me a river Karl. Enough of the sour g****s, Direll exposed you for all you're worth. You got lucky against Taylor, but you'll get your comeuppance in the form of Abraham or Ward. You've always been an arrogant cry baby, and it seems that some things never change.Comment
Comment