Comments Thread For: Carl Froch Discusses His Side of The "Amir Khan Feud"

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JCairo
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 163
    • 1
    • 0
    • 6,204

    #21
    i don't like froch more than the next guy. he was getting schooled by dirrell and got some warm hometowncooking in the decision. and he was losing that taylor fight until taylor gassed out. he got the knockout though so you can't take anything away from him for that. froch is a brawler-puncher but not the most skilled fighter. khan has the speed and power and looks alot more flashy in the ring. he also has the big name trainer so it's no wonder that he gets more attention. he seems to have that british wit/attitude that can be offputting to some americans, see his interview after the dirrell fight. all this said, if froch gets asked a question he's going to give his opinion, nothing wrong with that. not like the two will ever fight so theres no need to be diplomatic about it. i hope kessler woops froch and redeems himself from that ward fight though.

    Comment

    • Jim Jeffries
      rugged individualist
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2007
      • 20741
      • 1,376
      • 2,868
      • 54,838

      #22
      Originally posted by Dynamite Kid
      Froch is right about Salita. And he will only have more bullets when Khan negotiates his career around fighting old small men like JMM and past it fighters like Hatton, non punchers like Spadafora.

      The guy is a con job.
      But who was Froch fighting at Khan's age?

      Nevermind, he hadn't even turned pro yet.

      Comment

      • The Monk
        Secularist fo life!
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2007
        • 1893
        • 266
        • 414
        • 10,409

        #23
        Originally posted by 02bash
        exactly carl froch wasnt a known fighter and he beat taylor, so you shouldn't underestimate anyone, and salita is a mandatory. thanks for helping me prove my point more.
        What on earth are you talking about? Because we haven't heard of a boxer we shouldn't underestimate them, well boxers have resumes which we can use to get an insight into how well they may do. Before Froch fought Taylor he had beaten decent boxers on the domestic and international stage and had a high KO percentage to boot. Salita on the other hand has pillows for fists and had beaten no-one of note, while drawing to a journeyman. It is perfectly reasonable to question Salita's position as a mandatory and the fight being on PPV.

        I am a fan of both boxers, but Froch is speaking the truth here.

        Comment

        • 02bash
          Up and Comer
          • Sep 2008
          • 49
          • 5
          • 3
          • 6,296

          #24
          Originally posted by The Monk
          What on earth are you talking about? Because we haven't heard of a boxer we shouldn't underestimate them, well boxers have resumes which we can use to get an insight into how well they may do. Before Froch fought Taylor he had beaten decent boxers on the domestic and international stage and had a high KO percentage to boot. Salita on the other hand has pillows for fists and had beaten no-one of note, while drawing to a journeyman. It is perfectly reasonable to question Salita's position as a mandatory and the fight being on PPV.

          I am a fan of both boxers, but Froch is speaking the truth here.
          you again, how can you type when your hugging carl froch's nuts at the same time.

          Comment

          • 02bash
            Up and Comer
            • Sep 2008
            • 49
            • 5
            • 3
            • 6,296

            #25
            Originally posted by The Monk
            What on earth are you talking about? Because we haven't heard of a boxer we shouldn't underestimate them, well boxers have resumes which we can use to get an insight into how well they may do. Before Froch fought Taylor he had beaten decent boxers on the domestic and international stage and had a high KO percentage to boot. Salita on the other hand has pillows for fists and had beaten no-one of note, while drawing to a journeyman. It is perfectly reasonable to question Salita's position as a mandatory and the fight being on PPV.

            I am a fan of both boxers, but Froch is speaking the truth here.
            carl froch resume, polish builders, and a shot robin reid, oh and a police man thats p4p material right there.

            Comment

            • S H O B O X
              Showman
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 2573
              • 132
              • 370
              • 9,294

              #26
              Originally posted by The Monk
              What on earth are you talking about? Because we haven't heard of a boxer we shouldn't underestimate them, well boxers have resumes which we can use to get an insight into how well they may do. Before Froch fought Taylor he had beaten decent boxers on the domestic and international stage and had a high KO percentage to boot. Salita on the other hand has pillows for fists and had beaten no-one of note, while drawing to a journeyman. It is perfectly reasonable to question Salita's position as a mandatory and the fight being on PPV.

              I am a fan of both boxers, but Froch is speaking the truth here.
              is it just me or does morales look like khan in your sig

              Comment

              • The Monk
                Secularist fo life!
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2007
                • 1893
                • 266
                • 414
                • 10,409

                #27
                Originally posted by 02bash
                carl froch resume, polish builders, and a shot robin reid, oh and a police man thats p4p material right there.
                Ok, I see you're a ****. Can't be arsed to waste my time with you.

                Comment

                • 02bash
                  Up and Comer
                  • Sep 2008
                  • 49
                  • 5
                  • 3
                  • 6,296

                  #28
                  Originally posted by The Monk
                  Ok, I see you're a ****. Can't be arsed to waste my time with you.
                  your the ****, and you dont want to reply becuase there is absolutely no way you can say carl froch is remotely good before he fought jermain taylor.

                  Comment

                  • THEGRANDSLAM
                    Banned
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 62
                    • 4
                    • 0
                    • 103

                    #29
                    Froch is a hater, he was taking shots at Calzaghe when he was Commonwealth Champion and knocking over tomato cans. He can't just worry about himself, he's always gotta hate on someone else. I'm dying for someone to knock him out and I'm English, he got schooled for 11 and a half rounds by a shot Taylor and acts like he's King Jaffy Joffa.

                    Comment

                    • Stick_and_move
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 104
                      • 10
                      • 0
                      • 6,366

                      #30
                      [QUOTE=02bash;6922478]exactly carl froch wasnt a known fighter and he beat taylor, so you shouldn't underestimate anyone, and salita is a mandatory. thanks for helping me prove my point more.[/QUOTEC

                      Cry me a river Karl. Enough of the sour g****s, Direll exposed you for all you're worth. You got lucky against Taylor, but you'll get your comeuppance in the form of Abraham or Ward. You've always been an arrogant cry baby, and it seems that some things never change.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP