i always watch the fight the first time when i score it with the sound off, and there is no way coleman won that fight, not in how a fight should be scored, and who did the most damage.
i saw colemans head get snapped back, saw him hurt with a couple of bodyshots, not the low blow, which was on the belt, i saw arnaoutis pck off a lot of shots that coleman threw, i saw coleman hit a lot of elbows and gloves, and saw him get tired.
now, when i watched it again, with the sound on, it was the same thing, only thing that was different was, i wanted to announcers to shut the **** up because they were biased and should've been a little more unbiased, but at the same time, there were calling the fight right. but they way they were doing it, it almost made me start to root for coleman, but i am a fan of arnaoutis and had to score fair no matter what my personal feelings about either fighter may be........
they should rematch, and get some judges who aren't blind and corrupt.
i had arnaoutis winning 8-4........
i saw colemans head get snapped back, saw him hurt with a couple of bodyshots, not the low blow, which was on the belt, i saw arnaoutis pck off a lot of shots that coleman threw, i saw coleman hit a lot of elbows and gloves, and saw him get tired.
now, when i watched it again, with the sound on, it was the same thing, only thing that was different was, i wanted to announcers to shut the **** up because they were biased and should've been a little more unbiased, but at the same time, there were calling the fight right. but they way they were doing it, it almost made me start to root for coleman, but i am a fan of arnaoutis and had to score fair no matter what my personal feelings about either fighter may be........
they should rematch, and get some judges who aren't blind and corrupt.
i had arnaoutis winning 8-4........
Comment