Who won: Mike Arnaoutis or Tim Coleman? Poll.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nobuhiro Sugoi
    kakkoii!
    • Aug 2008
    • 440
    • 47
    • 19
    • 6,762

    #11
    Originally posted by DrewWoodside
    You have a 60' HD? Does it have rims on the side too? That's pretty sick bro, you must be really pimp. Luckily for me I could have watched that **** on my Ipod and known who won the fight. Get your eyes checked or find a new sport.


    1) racists should be banned.


    B) to be fair I scored rounds 1-3 closely then I was on the phone with my girl for a minute resumed watching closely in round 7. And no she is not pregnant.

    Comment

    • 2120
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2006
      • 1723
      • 111
      • 383
      • 14,349

      #12
      Originally posted by DrewWoodside
      Funeka/Guzman, Arnaoutis/Coleman were legit robberies. There were a lot of close and difficult fights to score. The two previously mentioned however were just complete bull****.

      the first thing that came to my mind once they announce the decision for arnaoutis vs coleman fight was the bull**** decision between funeka and guzman.

      I am always curious when I see a bull**** decision, are the judges being paid off, incompetent, or just falling asleep during the match?

      Comment

      • DrewWoodside
        Lifestyle..Regular!
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jan 2008
        • 9244
        • 317
        • 590
        • 16,453

        #13
        Originally posted by BULLIT
        1) racists should be banned.


        B) to be fair I scored rounds 1-3 closely then I was on the phone with my girl for a minute resumed watching closely in round 7. And no she is not pregnant.
        So you're blind and you desperately play the race card.. You really bring a lot to the table, boxingscene is lucky to have you as a member.

        Comment

        • DrewWoodside
          Lifestyle..Regular!
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jan 2008
          • 9244
          • 317
          • 590
          • 16,453

          #14
          Originally posted by 2120
          the first thing that came to my mind once they announce the decision for arnaoutis vs coleman fight was the bull**** decision between funeka and guzman.

          I am always curious when I see a bull**** decision, are the judges being paid off, incompetent, or just falling asleep during the match?
          There was definitely a wierd eeriness the second VS came back from commercial to announce the scores. My initial reaction was no way they aren't gonna try this bull****. At least the announcers were decent enough to acknowledge it was nonsense.

          Comment

          • tnf1400
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Dec 2004
            • 156
            • 14
            • 41
            • 7,867

            #15
            8-4 Mike

            His punches were nice and strait, more energy, controlled the action and pushed Coleman back from the 5 round on.

            Comment

            • BloodClottey
              Up and Comer
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Apr 2008
              • 93
              • 2
              • 0
              • 6,177

              #16
              I had Coleman 7-5 in this fight. You guys were listening to that absurd announcing. Jabbing and movement do not always equal a fight win. Coleman did more damage, was better defensively. Clean, effective punching and ring generalship holds the day. Close fight but Rosen and Matthews were ridiculously biased. Watch the fight without the sound on and you will score it differently.

              Comment

              • DrewWoodside
                Lifestyle..Regular!
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2008
                • 9244
                • 317
                • 590
                • 16,453

                #17
                Originally posted by BloodClottey
                I had Coleman 7-5 in this fight. You guys were listening to that absurd announcing. Jabbing and movement do not always equal a fight win. Coleman did more damage, was better defensively. Clean, effective punching and ring generalship holds the day. Close fight but Rosen and Matthews were ridiculously biased. Watch the fight without the sound on and you will score it differently.
                The ring generalship all belonged to Arnaoutis, and opening a cut in the last round of a 12 round fight does not equal more damage. Robbed.

                Comment

                • DC Fight Fan
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jun 2009
                  • 1852
                  • 61
                  • 40
                  • 8,111

                  #18
                  Originally posted by BULLIT
                  1) racists should be banned.


                  B) to be fair I scored rounds 1-3 closely then I was on the phone with my girl for a minute resumed watching closely in round 7. And no she is not pregnant.
                  You just made yourself a nominee for the BS idiot of the day.


                  Also, I think you are a racist because there are no white guys in your sig.

                  GTFOH

                  Comment

                  • The Hammer
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 50797
                    • 3,416
                    • 8,704
                    • 58,851

                    #19
                    I scored it 9 rounds to 3 for Arnaoutis.

                    Robberies like this (and Funeka-Guzman last weekend) are ruining the sport. These judges need to be held accountable.

                    Comment

                    • DrewWoodside
                      Lifestyle..Regular!
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jan 2008
                      • 9244
                      • 317
                      • 590
                      • 16,453

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Carnivore
                      I scored it 9 rounds to 3 for Arnaoutis.

                      Robberies like this (and Funeka-Guzman last weekend) are ruining the sport. These judges need to be held accountable.
                      The problem is NSB calls everything a robbery. There is a big difference between a difficult fight or close fight to score and a robbery. Funeka, Arnaoutis were robbed. Clottey/Cotto, Froch/Dirrell were not. Those fights could be debated. Funeka/Arnaoutis can not. Funeka being the more outrageous of the two.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP