If Floyd Schools Him For 12 Long Rounds !!!

[Left Hook Tua]

Yea is Corley he had the WBO from what I remember and lost it to Zab Judah...

so he did have a belt once.

who did he beat for a belt?

[DoubleM]

Gatti was not ring champ. And, Oscar was not ring champ either he Winky and nobody has won it since. When Floyd beat Oscar. At time Spinks was #1 and Karmazin #2. Don't make stuff up bro. Oscar lost the ring belt to Mosley. And, if you say he did then who did he beat to get it back? Cuz Mayorga was not ring champ.

I never said Gatti was not a ring champ. I said Mayweather won a belt vs Gatti.

Oscar was the ring champion @ 154. Lineal is "the guy who beat the guy". Ring is based entirely different. It's like saying Baldomir is the lineal but is he the #1 WW? No.....

Oscar was ring champ, deal with it.

[DoubleM]

oscar was not the ring champion at 154 when floyd beat him.

diego was not the ring champion at 130 when floyd beat him.

castillo was not the ring champion at 135 when floyd beat him.

hatton was the ring champion at 140 but floyd didn't fight him at 140.

Wrong.......

Wrong......

Wrong........

Hatton is true, that that is still a ring champion.

[Left Hook Tua]

I never said Gatti was not a ring champ. I said Mayweather won a belt vs Gatti.

Oscar was the ring champion @ 154. Lineal is "the guy who beat the guy". Ring is based entirely different. It's like saying Baldomir is the lineal but is he the #1 WW? No.....

Oscar was ring champ, deal with it.

he was ring champ at 154 4-5 years before floyd fought him.

he wasn't ring champ at 154 when floyd beat him.

[jrosales13]

I never said Gatti was not a ring champ. I said Mayweather won a belt vs Gatti.

Oscar was the ring champion @ 154. Lineal is "the guy who beat the guy". Ring is based entirely different. It's like saying Baldomir is the lineal but is he the #1 WW? No.....

Oscar was ring champ, deal with it.

Who did Oscar beat to be the ring champ?

Both Karmazin and Spinks were ranked higher than him at the time...

[Left Hook Tua]

Wrong.......

Wrong......

Wrong........

Hatton is true, that that is still a ring champion.

there's a difference between being ranked #1 and being the ring champion.

corrales and castillo was ranked #1 at 130 and 135 when floyd beat them but they were not ring champion.

corrales and castillo did not win a ring belt 'til years later at 135.

[jrosales13]

Wrong.......

Wrong......

Wrong........

Hatton is true, that that is still a ring champion.

Is not wrong. Castillo was not ring champ. The ring belt was vacant. Floyd won the vacancy ring title with Castillo. Cuz Floyd was ranked #1 and Castillo #2.

Corrales never won the ring title at 130.

[jrosales13]

so he did have a belt once.

who did he beat for a belt?

Damn that I don't know... I want to say he won the vacant WBO by beating Randall Bailey but don't quote me on that.

[DoubleM]

there's a difference between being ranked #1 and being the ring champion.

corrales and castillo was ranked #1 at 130 and 135 when floyd beat them but they were not ring champion.

corrales and castillo did not win a ring belt 'til years later at 135.

Ok, than I have been wrong my entire life on this then. Please explain how being ranked #1 is diffrent than a ring champion.

But if you want to talk resume wise, Corrales and Castillo went on to win world championships after mayweather beating them as well as C.hernandez and Jesus Chavez..which speaks volumes for his resume.

I'm off to bed.

[Allucard]

not really.

even if floyd schools him , manny still has a better resume and legacy.

LOL What does poor Floyd have to do to get some credit for being what he really is: The best of this generation and one of the all time true greats? I think Floyd already has a pretty good resume. Pacquiao's a little better right now but a win over Pacquiao will set Floyd apart, that's why he's fighting him. Floyd knows what he's doing.