Is pacquiao really 7 division champ

[Ryn0]

This doesnt even make sense. Tha **** your trying to say?

Hopkins wasnt the lineal Champion at LHW nor Tarver, it was Zsolt Erdei.

And Pac was indeed the FW lineal champ and is the Jr WW lineal chamo.

But the lineage doesnt constitute a title and evven though the ring title maye more credible it doesnt count as a belt either.


WBO,WBA,WBC,IBF are the world titles!!!

FML, I meant Ring Mag. But you get what I mean If you don't consider Hopkins (or Calzaghe for that matter because they held the ring Mag titles) then you shouldn't include Pac because in most instances a Lineal title is about as Valid as the ring.

I take it you don't include Lineal titles?

[Ryn0]

No he is not.

He is a 5 division title Holder in the 16 weight divisions as of now and he is a 3 division title holder in the original 8 weight classes.

Seeing as how Barrera vacated his WBC belt due to sanctioning fees after the Morales win anyway (and hadn't lost til he fought Pac) IMO the lineal belt counts.

Especially as your counting someone like Diaz.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

this...

if your'e not gonna count the hatton win for a title, then you shouldn't count the barrera win either.

funny, those two are pac's most legit claim to be the best in that particular division.

anyways, pac's record 4 linear belts>his record 7 championships. no matter how you cut it, its still impressive

The Barerra nor the Hatton fights counts as titles ut I agree with you that 4 divisional titles>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that ollocks 7 division champ(wich he isnt).

the fairest way to say it is pacquiao has a claim to be one of the best in 7 divisions. that is if you include linear and alphabet titles in that equation.

Fixed for you!!!


ut your 2 posts are definetly very good!!

[aether]

i for one rather call him a 7 weight champion rather than a 5 weight champion. that's like saying David Diaz is a more legit win than Barrera.

[joartcc5]

Pac won the IBO belt from Hatton which is not an official title.So in reality he`s a 6 division champ.

Its already clear ur a ***** moron.

So dont highlight it further.

We already know.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

FML, I meant Ring Mag. But you get what I mean If you don't consider Hopkins (or Calzaghe for that matter because they held the ring Mag titles) then you shouldn't include Pac because in most instances a Lineal title is about as Valid as the ring.

I take it you don't include Lineal titles?

Another senseless post. Homie, WTF are you trying to say?

Hopkins nor Calzaghe were lineal champs at LHW nor Tarver. It was Zsolt Erdei. Lineal is the man who beat the man who beat the man and on and on. The Ring title often concurs with the lineal, ut the RIng title dont determine the lineage of a division!

The lineaged is not a title is just the man who beat the man!!!

Seeing as how Barrera vacated his WBC belt due to sanctioning fees after the Morales win anyway (and hadn't lost til he fought Pac) IMO the lineal belt counts.

Especially as your counting someone like Diaz.

again the lineage of a division is not a title is a distinction.

David Diaz had a world title, so that counts. As for resume is not a great win for Manny, but it counts as a title won!!

[Chups]

Most of the boxing fans and authorities recognizes the WBC, WBA, IBF, IBO, Ring and lineal titles as Major championship titles. IBO is a minor title, but that's not the reason why Pacquiao was considered a Champ at Lt. Welterweight. Hatton was a Ring/lineal titlist, that was taken away from him when he got KOed.

5 division Champs

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_boxing_quintuple_champions

7 division Champ

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septuple_Champion

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

i for one rather call him a 7 weight champion rather than a 5 weight champion. that's like saying David Diaz is a more legit win than Barrera.

No its not. Its just saying that he havent won titles in 7 divisions just 5.

As for his resume his win over Barrera>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Diaz.

Its juts that the lineage of a division is not a title!!

[mellow_mood]

Most of the boxing fans and authorities recognizes the WBC, WBA, IBF, IBO, Ring and lineal titles as Major championship titles. IBO is a minor title, but that's not the reason why Pacquiao was considered a Champ at Lt. Welterweight. Hatton was a Ring/lineal titlist, that was taken away from him when he got KOed.

5 division Champs

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_boxing_quintuple_champions

7 division Champ

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septuple_Champion

camacho was the fighter that got me into boxing!!

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Most of the boxing fans and authorities recognizes the WBC, WBA, IBF, IBO, Ring and lineal titles as Major championship titles. IBO is a minor title, but that's not the reason why Pacquiao was considered a Champ at Lt. Welterweight. Hatton was a Ring/lineal titlist, that was taken away from him when he got KOed.

5 division Champs

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_boxing_quintuple_champions

7 division Champ

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septuple_Champion

Wikipedia? Really? Wikipedia? LMAO jajajajaajaj

Come on Chups you are a great poster, tha **** was that?