Pacquiao a Tough Fight For Mayweather, Says Wright

[go1nbanana]

no defense hasn't any holes in them, unless you have 4 arms and faster than the fastest out there. i doubt floyd is faster than manny, considering his age and ring rust plus he wasn't that great when moving up to 147. roach will find holes in floyd's defense and with manny's speed and accuracy (with power) it will likely bring damage to floyd. he may not be easy to hit, it will take a speed at manny's level to catch floyd multiple times in a combo.

[Chase8400]

What makes you guys think FLOYD is on another level? Who's the one C level opponent he beat to support your claim? The truth is, we don't know how GREAT FLOYD REALLY IS? Do we? He's a really GOOD fighter but the WHITAKERS, RAY LEONARDS, ALI'S, he's not. He's never been knocked down, cut, defeated, because he hasn't been fighting the best like he claims. He's in denial about the level of opposition he's faced his whole career. Had he been fighting A level fighters, he wouldn't be undefeated and that's a fact. He may beat MANNY, he may not but he has a very small window to win over us REAL boxing fans by facing all the top welter's we don't think he would beat. RIGHT OR WRONG?

If you think this, you obviously don't know what seperates a fact from an opinion. (Bolded)

You may be right, but seriously, who could have beaten him had he fought them best for best? You see that he had no problem with JMM and Pac was in two life or death battles with him. I'm not saying the guy is a 1990's Rjj, but he's definitely special and will most likely give Manny a boxing lesson.

But like Winky, Pacquiao taught me a lesson not to bet against him in the ODLH and Hatton fights.

[COVID-19]

Pacman will eat a lot of counter punches from Floyd to get near him.

[Stick_and_move]

Carlisle, you are a serious hater dude...Who in the hell did Manny beat to prove his greatness? Tell me that. Manny Pacquiao fought an old, weight-drained Oscar DeLaHoya. Floyd Mayweather fought DeLaHoya at 154lbs. Manny Pacquiao fought a Ricky Hatton that was already knocked out and plus he fought with his chin in the air. Floyd Mayweather fought an undefeated and Confident Ricky Hatton and knocked him out. Manny Pacquiao fought a Miguel Cotto was knocked out by Antonio Margarito; plus he was slow and unsure of himself which equals=No Confidence. Floyd Mayweather fought an undefeated Diego Corrales who was also a champion.

Manny Pacquiao moved up in weight and fought a very limited David Diaz and it still took him almost 12 rounds to knock him out. Floyd Mayweather moved up in weight and took on the best the division had to offer him; and won a decision over Jose Luis Castillo and gave him an immediate rematch and beat the brakes off of him. Manny Pacquiao knocked down Marquez 3 times in the first round, and still had a draw. Now that is really pathetic. He lost both fights against Marquez and would not fight him a third time.

So it seems to me that Manny is the real fraud. He ask for catchweight fights so his opponents come in drained and you want to say (wow, this guy is ****ing awesome) I would say: wow, this gay guy wants all of the advantages because he or his team doesn't have confidence in his ability. Enough with this BS catchweights; it's taking away from the opponents of Manny and he is not as good as you think he is, otherwise he would have gave Marquez a third fight after 2 tough fights. He would not ask for catchweight fights against and old DeLaHoya or an underconfidence Cotto. Enough with the hero attitude on Manny, he is more like a zero. Heros don't ask for this many advantages.

Is it me, or are you really this ignorant?. You're obviously blinded by the glitz and glamour of one Floyd Mayweather. Ok, the man is a purist when it comes to boxing technique, but lets be honest... he's been ducking the legitimate competition for far too long. Are you that deluded, that you fail to recognise Mayrunners hand picked opponents?. Does Baldomir, Gatti and Marquez not ring a relatively sized bell??. Come on, lets at least be impartial here. Regardless of the outcome of the Manny vs Floyd fight, we all know who will be remembered.

To be the best, you have to face the best. In the eyes of any true boxing enthusiast, Mayweather will always be remembered for the man who ducked and dived his way through a 'what could have been' legacy.

[bluetuazon]

floyd might walk pacuaio down with body punches and defense dont be surprised if u see pac cut early

i was reading the ver good exchange of points until i saw this post...

have u seen the pac cotto fight????

pac will cut? pac will be broken doen with body shots??

and floyd now hits hard???

lol...seriously bro...ur joking right?

[bluetuazon]

Pac man is good, but just that. He has avoided black fighters all his career. He's finally taking that risk now, proves it.

boy!! go back to cleaning my lawn!! im not paying you to post moronic statements here in this site!!!!!! go back to work u ****in lowlife scum!!! lol

wait..are u in the internet cafe u trailer trash??? lol

[bluetuazon]

Is it me, or are you really this ignorant?. You're obviously blinded by the glitz and glamour of one Floyd Mayweather. Ok, the man is a purist when it comes to boxing technique, but lets be honest... he's been ducking the legitimate competition for far too long. Are you that deluded, that you fail to recognise Mayrunners hand picked opponents?. Does Baldomir, Gatti and Marquez not ring a relatively sized bell??. Come on, lets at least be impartial here. Regardless of the outcome of the Manny vs Floyd fight, we all know who will be remembered.

To be the best, you have to face the best. In the eyes of any true boxing enthusiast, Mayweather will always be remembered for the man who ducked and dived his way through a 'what could have been' legacy.

post of the day!!

have some green k!

[mekal1999]

From what ive seen Floyd has the power, and pac has the speed. Both are accurate. I would say Pac has better offense, and Floyd has better Defense/counter punching skills. Speed kills, I got money on pac by Dession.

[SceneSpectator!]

yeah but floyd fought de la hoya at 154 his natural weight and pac weight drained him

You told one truth and omitted the other fact is a childish cunning attempt to mislead public knowledge. True, ODLH from his natural weight of 154lbs needs to dehydrate to meet the agreed weight at the next lower weight class of Welterweight, but why not to tell this fact too that Pac who was then just new comer at 135lbs, needs to inflate himself to Welterweight, passing 2 weight classes up actually???


This was basically the matched up of a weightdrained fighter versus an inflated fighter, and the result showed more that the fastest and skilled fighter between the two prevailed!

[SceneSpectator!]

If you think this, you obviously don't know what seperates a fact from an opinion. (Bolded)

You may be right, but seriously, who could have beaten him had he fought them best for best? You see that he had no problem with JMM and Pac was in two life or death battles with him. I'm not saying the guy is a 1990's Rjj, but he's definitely special and will most likely give Manny a boxing lesson.

But like Winky, Pacquiao taught me a lesson not to bet against him in the ODLH and Hatton fights.

You're a one-eye blind! Don't tell **** about Floyd beating a blown up JMM and that Pac had a hard time disposing JMM??? You're ******!

First of all, you see how Pac wanted to get fast from Featherweight to Junior welter? Because he felt featherweight was no longer his appropriate weight that might most likely explain why he had difficulty dealing with JMM!
But granting your analogy is correct that if Pac could not easily disposed JMM, and Floyd easily beat JMM in one sided fashion, Floyd would therefore better than Pac and will beat Pac. How about this, if Floyd took him 10 rounds to KO Hatton and hardly disposed ODLH in the whole 12 rounds, and Pac disposed easily Hatton in just 2 rounds while wins in a more brutal one sided beatings to ODLH, does it mean that Pac is better than Floyd based in your one-sided analogy, huh???

Who is better then in your contracictory analogy, huh??? :****you: