Paulie Malignagi still +120 to win?? Why?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Guest
    • 0
    • 0
    • 0

    #31
    Originally posted by The Gambler1981
    It was a fairly even fight the first time, so either side that is the favorite is a good bet.

    Those odds are pretty even though, with a slight edge to Malinaggi that is about right.

    Who you got Gambler?

    I am gonna go to this one so I can't bet it.

    I think the odds are where they should be.

    Chicago is very pro-Mexican. I don't think it's exacly neutral although the refs are pretty good here overall and the commission is good.

    But Geno Rodriguez screws up sometimes but he's done well in a lot of fights.

    Comment

    • Beater_of_ass
      male ass that is
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jun 2009
      • 7172
      • 281
      • 144
      • 13,666

      #32
      I don't know how people thought Diaz even won the fight TBH. It was a 7-5 fight, but I thought Paulie clearly won by two rounds. That being said Paulie did deserve the rematch, not because he was robbed or that Diaz one but by that one single scorecard as stated. Had it been closer he wouldn't be getting his shot, but its the ONE judge that he said would make it obvious that was a hometown favorite and that fight even while I think wasn't close for Diaz 118-111 is just insane. He deserves a rematch and really there isn't much in his favor, the fight is just more even now. It isn't like Paulie asked to have it in Jersey, with 3 Italian judges, and a ref with a Tommy Gun.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP