Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

W. KlitschkO Fight Predictions

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
    Almost right, they picked as good an opponent as Wlad was willing to face. .
    You keep saying that, and I keep asking who is better that Wlad should be fighting?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Neuraxis
      You keep saying that, and I keep asking who is better that Wlad should be fighting?

      And I keep telling you I never said he should be fighting anyone better.

      4th time: This is exactly the callibure of opponent he SHOULD be fighting.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
        And I keep telling you I never said he should be fighting anyone better.

        4th time: This is exactly the callibure of opponent he SHOULD be fighting.
        So I can see you have no intention of naming anyone while continuously badmouthing Castillo, and I think he should be fighting someone like Etienne until he starts looking better.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Neuraxis
          So I can see you have no intention of naming anyone while continuously badmouthing Castillo.
          ARE YOU ******??

          How many times and different ways do I have to say I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANYONE HE SHOULD BE FIGHTING INSTEAD.

          Castillo is the perfect kind of opponent for Wlad at this point: a smaller Heavyweight (6'2 215) who's green and hasn't beaten anyone worth anything.

          I can't help you're absolutly trying to KID yourself about Castillo.

          He's had only EIGHT fights at Heavyweight, and fought to a draw agaisnt THIS Cruiserweight http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=007597.

          Castillo is a soft opppent, stop kidding yourself.

          And for the 5th time, a soft opponent is EXACTLY what he needs right now.

          WOW. I might as well be talking to Wlad's mom here.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Munn
            Unlike you, I don't give fighters "credibility" for being able to speak after being KO'd. I give them credit for what they do in the ring, during the fight.

            No need to call me ****** because I've questioned a post.

            Your are right that "in the spce of one round" everything became very fuggin' ugly for Vlad. That can happen in boxing, on a given night. Face it, with or without a "drug", Vlad did not fall down on his own, he got tagged.

            Sanders had proved in the fight previous that Vlad was quite hittable and that Vlad did not have the experience or ability to cover-up when hurt. Instead, Vlad tried to keep throwin', which lost him the fight. That is the real Vlad, for better or worse, when not having his way. He's a guy that doesn't react very good to being hit.
            I'll definitely agree with you on the point that it was Wlad's inexperience in a KO situation that cost him the match with Sanders. He simply lost composure and tried to fight his way out of it, and you just dont do that with Corrie Sanders.

            But in the Brewster fight, his exhaustion was just too sudden. Exhaustion is a gradual thing, nothing like what took place inthe fourth round. Prior to that, Brewster was losing.

            Come on man, you know either King or the Mafia had a hand in that outcome. Too much money was to be made if you bet on Brewster and won. He was drugged. You know it and I know it. It certainly isnt beneath King to do something like this. Especially to a young fighter who had rejected him earlier.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Runw/knives
              How did you karma bar get blue? WTF. Shame on everyone for giving this ****** good karma.

              If you don't agree with me, attack what I'm saying. Not me.

              Show some class.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by GranTorino
                But in the Brewster fight, his exhaustion was just too sudden. Exhaustion is a gradual thing, nothing like what took place inthe fourth round. Prior to that, Brewster was losing.

                Come on man, you know either King or the Mafia had a hand in that outcome. Too much money was to be made if you bet on Brewster and won. He was drugged. You know it and I know it. It certainly isnt beneath King to do something like this. Especially to a young fighter who had rejected him earlier.

                I suggest you watch the 5th round of this fight again.

                Brewster landed two monster left hooks, and that was the begining of the end.

                He was tired because he over exerted himself in the 1st 4 rounds AND because Brewster hurt him and followed up in the 5th.

                There's no excuses. Give Brewster some credit.


                Comment


                • Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
                  If you don't agree with me, attack what I'm saying. Not me.

                  Show some class.
                  **** YOU ******.

                  you are the one who called Neuraxis ******. He contributes. not you.

                  YOU SHOW SOME ****ING CLASS *****.
                  god. you annoy the **** out of me.

                  Telling me to show class......when you do not do it yourself.

                  ****ing ******. I plan on giving you bad karma for the end of time. Idiot. You have made it to santa's "no presents list".



                  Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!
                  Last edited by Run; 04-12-2005, 05:43 PM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
                    And where did I say either of those two things?

                    I didn't.

                    Again, you're so wounded in regards to this topic, you're lashing out at people.

                    I only lash out at biased idiots (you)

                    I wasn't twisting anything, I said it wasn't a big deal because it wasn't, you tried to make it sound like he was ****ing hurt or something, or like TOS gave him a run for his money, which simply isn't true. If his knee touched, then **** it, I was wrong, but he still was never hurt. My problem is this: I don't have any problem saying that Wlad needs work, or that he hasn't lived up to the hype, I'll meet the haters half-way, but the haters won't, instead of saying he needs work, or he's not there yet, they try to say ****** **** like he's washed up, that he's a bum. etc. I mean ****, has LL ever came off the canvas to win a fight? Tyson? It's pretty ****ing clear that you post out of bias, pure and simple. You make a good point or two, and then cancel it out by including so much BS in your posts. That TOS **** was weak and you know it.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by hollister
                      Maybe his knee touched the canvas, if it did it was only briefly, and he was never hurt. Look, you can twist **** to your liking all you want, but if that's what you call "being put on the canvas", you're delusional. Any, well almost any idiot could see he stumbled more than anything from being almost squared once he was hit, TOS was just there to take the credit. Like I said, to say he didn't live up to the hype is one thing, but the type of **** some of you haters are trying to imply is just ridiculous.

                      Damn straight, brother. You are on the money, and Im glad Im not the only one having to defend Wlad.

                      Here, have some Karma.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP