If Floyd beats Pac, Pac is not the best of this era, please stop that non sense.

[fcastro1]

If Floyd beats Pacman, it doesn't matter, Pac is still the best of this era.. Umm, no he isn't. If Floyd beats him, he isn't better then Floyd in this era. Therefore Floyd is the best of this era.

You can't have it both ways. Sorry.

Go ahead and say that pac has accomplished more in the era.. That's fine, because he has. In no way is he the best fighter though.. No ****ing way if he loses. He has proven to be a legit WW. Floyd is also a legit WW. The fight is completely even, and there will be no excuse like before.

Mark my words, but this fight will determine the fighter of the decade, aka the best fighter of this decade.

Im a neutral fan, and I very much like both fighters, so im real with this. Im so sick of Pac fans it's ridiculous.

to be honest, floyd needs to win atitle at middleweight to match what pac is doing right now.

[aether]

no....

first of all... we got less than 2 months left in the decade. so unless they fight on december, no way floyd will be fighter of the decade.

second, one fight doesn't give you that honor. lets say pacquiao and berto fights this december and berto wins. according to your logic, berto should be fighter of the decade.

[JohnCIV6]

Theres no argument here. Pac is in his prime.. Floyd is in or close to in his prime. Both are legit WW's. The better fighter will win.. How can there be an excuse?

Pac's best wins are against guy's Floyd beat... Except cotto....

Floyd demolished Marquez. A complete shut out. Pacman arguably lost twice.

WTF do you mean this wouldnt show who the best is?

Anyone who uses other greats with a loss are idiots.. This is not the same situation. Its agaisnt another great fighter, who has beat similair oppents. Completely different.

Read again.

[JohnCIV6]

no....

first of all... we got less than 2 months left in the decade. so unless they fight on december, no way floyd will be fighter of the decade.

second, one fight doesn't give you that honor. lets say pacquiao and berto fights this december and berto wins. according to your logic, berto should be fighter of the decade.

Theres a year and 2 months moron....

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

FAO: *****S

JUST CAUSE FLOYD BEATS PAC DOESN'T MEAN THAT ALL OF PAC'S ACCOMPLISHMENTS TRANSFER TO FLOYD. FLOYD HAS TO ACTUALLY FIGHT THE FIGHTS TO GET CREDIT!!!

this isn't like highlander where if you chop off another immortal's head, you get all their power. BOXING DON'T WORK LIKE THAT!!!

Correct Pull*****!!!!!

[trg6863]

Theres a year and 2 months moron....

Haven't we been over this already? Like someone else said, was year 2000 a part of the 90s?

[aether]

Theres a year and 2 months moron....

the decade started on January 1, 2000. it ends on January 1, 2010

[SplitSecond]

until roy jones retires his era is'nt over, so considering he's still fighting on, roy jones is still the best fighter of this era(the roy jones era)
jones did'nt even have a defence and got hit less than mayweather, WAR JONESY!!!

[aether]

Theres a year and 2 months moron....

yup... silly me.

[Kevin Jesus]

Floyd needs to capitalize on Pacquiao's retirement. After Pacquiao retires, probably after he loses to Floyd, Floyd can get a couple of big wins against Berto/Mosley and someone else, whoever else is relevant at the moment because there's always someone new for Floyd to fight.