During the build-up to Manny Pacquiao - Miguel Cotto, everybody kept saying that this would be a Fight Of The Year (FOTY) candidate. I agreed. Two guys who like to trade and engage and make it a back-n-forth fight. Miguel had been in those types of fights with both Shane and Margarito. Manny always wants a shoot-out.
But it got me to thinking. When and how did FOTY go from being "most important fight" to "Biggest War".
Here are some former FOTY's
Frazier-Foreman: This wasn't a fight, it was a prison ****. George knocked Smokin' Joe down a half-dozen times in a round a half and Joe was never in it ("down goes Fray-jah"). Thoroughly and completely one sided and over in a few minutes. Would we ever think of Pacquiao-Hatton as FOTY today?
Leonard-Hagler: A close fight? Definitely. A disputed decision? Eternally. An exciting fight? Not in your dreams. Ray didn't want to engage at all. SRL's plan was to stay away, then come in periodically to shoeshine and fluyrry and steal the rounds in the last 30 seconds. Throughout the fight, Hagler was coming forward and saying "Fight me, you b!tch". And Ray would shake nis head "no'. SRL had a (brilliant) plan, stuck with it, and enhanced his resume.
Ali-Foreman: Rumble in the Jungle. This was another fight that was more "meanngful" than it was "exciting". If you haven't seen this in its entirety, never again should you call yourself a boxing fan. Ali played the rope-a-dope technique where he waited for the younger/stronger Foreman to wear himself out a bit before he went to work with just a couple of hard counters that finished an exhausted George. But for the first six rounds, it was miserable to watch if you like back-n-forth exchanges.
How did our perception of FOTY go from those fights above to the Gatti/Ward, Vasquez/Marquez, Barrera/Morales prototypes that we expect today?
Have boxing fans changed that much? What changed?
But it got me to thinking. When and how did FOTY go from being "most important fight" to "Biggest War".
Here are some former FOTY's
Frazier-Foreman: This wasn't a fight, it was a prison ****. George knocked Smokin' Joe down a half-dozen times in a round a half and Joe was never in it ("down goes Fray-jah"). Thoroughly and completely one sided and over in a few minutes. Would we ever think of Pacquiao-Hatton as FOTY today?
Leonard-Hagler: A close fight? Definitely. A disputed decision? Eternally. An exciting fight? Not in your dreams. Ray didn't want to engage at all. SRL's plan was to stay away, then come in periodically to shoeshine and fluyrry and steal the rounds in the last 30 seconds. Throughout the fight, Hagler was coming forward and saying "Fight me, you b!tch". And Ray would shake nis head "no'. SRL had a (brilliant) plan, stuck with it, and enhanced his resume.
Ali-Foreman: Rumble in the Jungle. This was another fight that was more "meanngful" than it was "exciting". If you haven't seen this in its entirety, never again should you call yourself a boxing fan. Ali played the rope-a-dope technique where he waited for the younger/stronger Foreman to wear himself out a bit before he went to work with just a couple of hard counters that finished an exhausted George. But for the first six rounds, it was miserable to watch if you like back-n-forth exchanges.
How did our perception of FOTY go from those fights above to the Gatti/Ward, Vasquez/Marquez, Barrera/Morales prototypes that we expect today?
Have boxing fans changed that much? What changed?
Comment