Can you actually quote where he said that, he said in froch's hometown he thought dirrell didnt do enough to take decision, doesnt mean froch won.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Now you see why a slick black fighter is the most difficult fighter to fight
Collapse
-
-
Lol @ your "highlight video" Froch landing 1 punch and throwing Dirrell to floor, basically all he did all fight.
Comment
-
Ward would have won on any given day, but I will say this; Ward is one hell of a dirty fighter. He was intentionally head butting the whole fight and he was charging in head first like John Ruiz, in a hurry to hold. I appreciate skills, but I cant stand a dirty fighter and thats what Ward was last night.
Comment
-
-
Ward landed more headbutts than punches. Ward won the fight no doubt about it , but man he fought such a dirty fight. I was very upset that Ward never recieved a warning for holding or charging in with his head. Any other fighter in any other fight would have been deducted points. Just calling it like I saw it.
Comment
-
Slick black fighters, lmao. Why do people automatically go to race when someone is victorious to prove their point? How about I say strong white quarterbacks beat nutless, dogfighting black quarterbacks everytime? That's not cool, is it?
BTW, Dirrell lost because he has no balls. Froch chased him down, at a full running pace, and landed a big right hand. that's why Froch won. He has balls and he wants to fight. Dirrell just wants to protect his face. He needs to go sell Avon because he's not enough of a man to box.
Comment
-
Well, though I do think this guy is racist, I do KIND of get what he means by "slick black boxer". But the thing he keeps saying about slick black boxers not needing to jab? Wtf? Ali, Robinson. Leonard, Hopkins, Mayweather, RJJ and even Ward use the jab more than most boxers!! The reason why these boxers are so good is because they keep a tight defence, jab, have good movement and then unload combos off the jab when they think it's appropriate. It's when boxers don't use their jab that they tend to be in trouble. But what I don't buy is that a slick black boxer is always best.....every style has another style out there that can beat it. Ali ALWAYS had life or death battles with Frazier who is a brawler, Ray Robinson always struggled with Jake Lamotta a brawler, Hopkins struggles with anyone who throws lots of punches, Mayweather struggled with a Mexican hard nut Castillo, and so on. You can't say the best boxers are always black and slick, because thats discounting true warriors in the sport like Duran, Arguello, Armstrong, Marciano, Dempsey, Lamotta, Barrera, Morales...and of course the latest on the list....Manny Pacquiao.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ToneyLightsOut View PostThey have no form and dont fight with rhythm, look at Hopkins, Mayweather, Jones,Ward. They dont need jabs and they use their footwork as main wepon. If their opponent cant adapt they lose every round, thats why i questioned Kessler before this fight because the lack of black fighters he fought.
Hopkins too, he fights to disrupt your rhythm (same as Calzaghe but they do it through different styles) but because hes got a gameplan to disrupt your rhythm he never fights the same fight twice so even though he might have a rhythm during that fight, its no use looking at previous fights of his because it never going to be the same one.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ToneyLightsOut View PostThey have no form and dont fight with rhythm, look at Hopkins, Mayweather, Jones,Ward. They dont need jabs and they use their footwork as main wepon. If their opponent cant adapt they lose every round, thats why i questioned Kessler before this fight because the lack of black fighters he fought.
Nicolino Locche, Willie Pep, Benny Leonard all great White slick defensive fighters who had a great offense when needed.
Comment
Comment