Gene Tunney is an atg??? Why did he hold so much?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Benny Leonard
    Liberty
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2007
    • 7436
    • 303
    • 38
    • 14,471

    #1

    Gene Tunney is an atg??? Why did he hold so much?

    I don't like holding but I've always said I understood it's purpose even though it should be used less. Even when Hatton grappled Tszyu all fight long I didn't approve but did say I understood why he did it and that it was his best shot to win.

    So anyway...Gene Tunney, one of the Greatest Boxers of All Time understood the Science of fighting. If he could use it and get away with it, it became part of the fight. You take what is given to you. That's why Great Fighters like Gene Tunney won. It might not be what I like, but I understand it.



    Last edited by Benny Leonard; 11-22-2009, 12:30 AM.
  • krispy kreme
    Fiendin for toilet water
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 10832
    • 358
    • 898
    • 18,913

    #2
    lol, we all know where this will end up.

    Comment

    • DrewWoodside
      Lifestyle..Regular!
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jan 2008
      • 9244
      • 317
      • 590
      • 16,453

      #3
      Originally posted by Benny Leonard
      I don't like holding but I've always said I understood it's purpose even though it should be used less. Even when Hatton grappled Tszyu all fight long I didn't approve but did say I understood why he did it and that it was his best shot to win.

      So anyway...Gene Tunney, one of the Greatest Boxers of All Time understood the Science of fighting. If he could use it and get away with it, it became part of the fight. You take what is given to you. That's why Great Fighters like Gene Tunney won. It might not be what I like, but I understand it.



      Sounds like you're going directly for Carnivore's family ***els on this one!

      Comment

      • johnm is...
        ****in *** Broads
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2005
        • 10700
        • 820
        • 1,382
        • 48,813

        #4
        I know one person who's likely already red k'd you.

        Comment

        • Check
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2008
          • 16585
          • 677
          • 132
          • 26,287

          #5
          Low freaking blow! WW3 has begun.

          Comment

          • jrosales13
            undisputed champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 32632
            • 738
            • 763
            • 40,023

            #6
            I have no problem with fighters who hold a lot. This is a fight you do what you have to do. My problem is with the inept referee's who are not willing to enforce the rules. Holding is against the rules plain and simple. However, if a fighter can get away with it good for him. But, the referee's should enforce it.

            Comment

            • Thread Stealer
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Sep 2007
              • 9657
              • 439
              • 102
              • 17,804

              #7
              Jack Johnson

              Comment

              • SplitSecond
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Nov 2009
                • 23151
                • 1,715
                • 1,187
                • 85,044

                #8
                Originally posted by Benny Leonard
                I don't like holding but I've always said I understood it's purpose even though it should be used less. Even when Hatton grappled Tszyu all fight long I didn't approve but did say I understood why he did it and that it was his best shot to win.

                So anyway...Gene Tunney, one of the Greatest Boxers of All Time understood the Science of fighting. If he could use it and get away with it, it became part of the fight. You take what is given to you. That's why Great Fighters like Gene Tunney won. It might not be what I like, but I understand it.



                what would hopkins be without holding?
                considering holding is'nt even a part of boxing, it's actually illegal

                Comment

                • Benny Leonard
                  Liberty
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 7436
                  • 303
                  • 38
                  • 14,471

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Thread Stealer
                  Jack Johnson
                  Yes, I know, but there was a purpose to my thread point.

                  I could have even added a well known "ATG' dirty fighter but I stopped at this.

                  Comment

                  • Benny Leonard
                    Liberty
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 7436
                    • 303
                    • 38
                    • 14,471

                    #10
                    Originally posted by tehMatrix
                    what would hopkins be without holding?
                    considering holding is'nt even a part of boxing, it's actually illegal
                    Old timers used grappling a lot. It was part of boxing back in the day and seemed to slowly faded more away because people liked non-grappling boxing better. Not sure what the rules are myself.

                    In his Youth

                    Last edited by Benny Leonard; 11-22-2009, 06:51 AM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP