Lets Compare Pacquiao and Floyd

[sycomantz]

Shane didn't want to gamble his chances against Oscar. Would that be considered "Ducking"?

gamble b/c he thought he would potentially lose to May...yes, i call that ducking

[El Jesus]

Its not games, buddy, its the truth.

Theres no thread involving Mayweather, that when trying to defend him, his fans ending using those words, should, would or could!!!!

First of all, i presented you a question. Im far from what youd call a "nuthugger" or some valiant mayweather defender. i know his career. just like i know cottos. hattons. pacs. etc

Do you see me making useless threads just to discredit another fighter? Do you see me making threads justifying ppv buys, who makes more money etc? Do you even see me making threads to discredit someone resume? No. You dont.

Second of all, you talk about discussing facts and thats all im doing. Boxing is such a subjective sport, but i am giving you a timeline of what happened when and where, and this is what you reply with?

If you want to play the strawman and game and move the ****ing goalposts of youre argument into territory that not only is NOT pertinent to the argument, but a useless reply, the what is the point of you even making the thread?

[popeyes]

No. Wait. Answer my post before running away.

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6737500&postcount=44

Also, claiming a potential future opponent of your favorite fighter is overhyped or overrated does nothing except take the glory away from your fighters' win, if he wins. If he loses, he lost to a fighter you claimed is overrated, meaning your favorite fighter was even more overrated than you ever realized.

i predict that floyd fans are gonna come up with some lame excuse like he did it for the money

[S A M U R A I]

gamble b/c he thought he would potentially lose to May...yes, i call that ducking

Are you gonna answer post #44?



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[Doctor_Tenma]

gamble b/c he thought he would potentially lose to May...yes, i call that ducking

I'm not so sure honestly.

[S A M U R A I]

i predict that floyd fans are gonna come up with some lame excuse like he did it for the money

Yup. But that's fine as long as they tell the truth and say Pacquiao is the worst opponent on his resume and never brag about beating him.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[Doctor_Tenma]

First of all, i presented you a question. Im far from what youd call a "nuthugger" or some valiant mayweather defender. i know his career. just like i know cottos. hattons. pacs. etc

Do you see me making useless threads just to discredit another fighter? Do you see me making threads justifying ppv buys, who makes more money etc? Do you even see me making threads to discredit someone resume? No. You dont.

Second of all, you talk about discussing facts and thats all im doing. Boxing is such a subjective sport, but i am giving you a timeline of what happened when and where, and this is what you reply with?

If you want to play the strawman and game and move the ****ing goalposts of youre argument into territory that not only is NOT pertinent to the argument, but a useless reply, then what is the point of you even making the thread?

To remind us of something we already know. Those are most of Boxingscene's threads, To make a thread asking a question with an obvious answer only to hate.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

First of all, i presented you a question. Im far from what youd call a "nuthugger" or some valiant mayweather defender. i know his career. just like i know cottos. hattons. pacs. etc

Do you see me making useless threads just to discredit another fighter? Do you see me making threads justifying ppv buys, who makes more money etc? Do you even see me making threads to discredit someone resume? No. You dont.

Second of all, you talk about discussing facts and thats all im doing. Boxing is such a subjective sport, but i am giving you a timeline of what happened when and where, and this is what you reply with?

If you want to play the strawman and game and move the ****ing goalposts of youre argument into territory that not only is NOT pertinent to the argument, but a useless reply, the what is the point of you even making the thread?

First put your Vagisile down, I never accuse you of a nuthugger or anythng like it. So take it easy.


Second Should, would or Could are not facts!!!!


Third I did answer what you ask, and you came ack with the FLoyd, would, would ,would, wich aint facts!!!!

[sycomantz]

No. Wait. Answer my post before running away.

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6737500&postcount=44

Also, claiming a potential future opponent of your favorite fighter is overhyped or overrated does nothing except take the glory away from your fighters' win, if he wins. If he loses, he lost to a fighter you claimed is overrated, meaning your favorite fighter was even more overrated than you ever realized.

heres your answer.

DLH got beat up by Forbes after losing to May. severely emaciated and had no energy....pac gets no ccredit

May toyed, brutally punished and KO'ed hatton. hatton got punished so much, people said he sould retire directly after losing to may...pac gets no credit.

Cotto was beaten into a pulp by marg with plaster, later loosing to clottey. wich showed he wasnt the same cotto as pre-marg...again. pac gets no credit

and i have said before. when FLoyd beats pac, it will be the norm. thats hes always been the greatest. and it will be shown that pac was hype just like hatton was

watch how HBO boxing analysts jump back on Mayweathers nuts when he schools pac. they will once again say hes the greatest like they always do

[Xcusemymood]

Even Mayweather fans know this. Thing is, why take plessure in comparing Mayweather's resume to Pacquiao, when Mayweather has no interest in enhancing his legacy?

Because he has nothing better to do with his life than hate, hate, hate.

Bunch of little kids on here.