Margarito caught red-handed??

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JMM_135_#1
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Mar 2009
    • 282
    • 9
    • 12
    • 6,668

    #21
    Originally posted by Beater_of_ass
    The fact that there was also a red stain, whether it be blood or the dye from the glove rubbing off of the glove doesn't matter. What matters is that the "brick" that fell out of Margarito's wraps had the same color stain on them in the same spot. It wasn't as big, but you could tell it had been worn before and personally I've never seen or heard of a fighter using the same gauze or tape in two different fights.





    Its more than enough proof, to me at least, that he used against Cotto. Add to the fact that this was Marg last shot at ever becoming a 7 figure fighter, as a win for either fighter is what was going to set them up with a shot at DLH or any other big name fighter. I never understood why people would think he would use against Mosley but not Cotto. Mosley was essentially looked at as a tune-up fight for Marg, considering the fashion he disposed of Cotto. The fact is the Cotto fight WAS the biggest fight of both Marg and Cotto's career, why you would use to beat up a "old man" like Mosley and not an undefeated monster, in THE biggest fight of your career is simply idiotic. But with this pictures I'm not sure how there can really be any doubt that he didn't use. Sure, he never got caught in this fight and they'll always be Mexicans who ignore the obvious, and it isn't DEFINITIVE proof, but its more than enough to question his win.
    what ur missing though is this .... the pad in that pic has the stain on the opposite side ... so if it is the same pad its upside down in the pic... therefore if is is plaster or whatever do you really think that dye from the gloves or blood could go all the way through a solid object like that

    Comment

    • Beater_of_ass
      male ass that is
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jun 2009
      • 7172
      • 281
      • 144
      • 13,666

      #22
      Originally posted by JMM_135_#1
      what ur missing though is this .... the pad in that pic has the stain on the opposite side ... so if it is the same pad its upside down in the pic... therefore if is is plaster or whatever do you really think that dye from the gloves or blood could go all the way through a solid object like that
      It isn't on the opposite side, its the same exact side in the proper direction. It isn't upside down, and it really doesn't matter even if it was. Who uses the SAME wraps twice? Its really not even possible because the tape would lose all its stickiness and the gauze would be wasted as sweat would have already been soaked up. The simple fact that there is a stain, before the fight, before he even started warming up, in fact, only one hand was totally wrapped at that point how does a sweat stain even get there without anyone actually sweating? His right hand was wrapped, already, they were in the process of doing the left when it fell out. I find it funny how you even stated its not the same wrap, it obviously is. Just put the wrap over his knuckle, picture it. Its the left hand wrap with a picture of Margs left hand with a STAIN on the left pinky knuckle, I'm not missing the point, you're ignoring the obvious.

      Comment

      • JMM_135_#1
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 282
        • 9
        • 12
        • 6,668

        #23
        Originally posted by Beater_of_ass
        It isn't on the opposite side, its the same exact side in the proper direction. It isn't upside down, and it really doesn't matter even if it was. Who uses the SAME wraps twice? Its really not even possible because the tape would lose all its stickiness and the gauze would be wasted as sweat would have already been soaked up. The simple fact that there is a stain, before the fight, before he even started warming up, in fact, only one hand was totally wrapped at that point how does a sweat stain even get there without anyone actually sweating? His right hand was wrapped, already, they were in the process of doing the left when it fell out. I find it funny how you even stated its not the same wrap, it obviously is. Just put the wrap over his knuckle, picture it. Its the left hand wrap with a picture of Margs left hand with a STAIN on the left pinky knuckle, I'm not missing the point, you're ignoring the obvious.
        did you go to school, if you place tht pad on ur left hand the stain would be by your first knuckle... so it is upside work it out

        Comment

        • MANGLER
          Sex Tape Flop Artist
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 30142
          • 1,705
          • 2,355
          • 46,598

          #24

          Comment

          • Dondi33O
            Banned
            • Oct 2009
            • 1438
            • 78
            • 19
            • 1,664

            #25
            Originally posted by Get you mad?
            shut your ugly ass up the only drug dealers you know are on your playstation.
            Im sorry Did I get You mad...lmao

            Comment

            • Beater_of_ass
              male ass that is
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2009
              • 7172
              • 281
              • 144
              • 13,666

              #26
              Originally posted by JMM_135_#1
              did you go to school, if you place tht pad on ur left hand the stain would be by your first knuckle... so it is upside work it out
              Did I go to school? The only reason I can think of that you keep saying its upside down is because of the label on the plastic you sir, are a complete ****ing idiot. Its almost a perfect rectangle so how exactly can it be put upside down? Can you wrap gauze upside down? Can you tape something upside down? And if this is your best argument to fight this you even dumber than I first thought, because again, you're ignoring the fact that it shouldn't have ANYTHING on it in the first place. Who uses the same wraps twice, please tell me?

              Comment

              • JMM_135_#1
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Mar 2009
                • 282
                • 9
                • 12
                • 6,668

                #27
                Originally posted by Beater_of_ass
                Did I go to school? The only reason I can think of that you keep saying its upside down is because of the label on the plastic you sir, are a complete ****ing idiot. Its almost a perfect rectangle so how exactly can it be put upside down? Can you wrap gauze upside down? Can you tape something upside down? And if this is your best argument to fight this you even dumber than I first thought, because again, you're ignoring the fact that it shouldn't have ANYTHING on it in the first place. Who uses the same wraps twice, please tell me?
                no nothing to do with the lable, the stain is in the top right had corner, if u place it on ur left had tht would be at the first knuckle, so its the wrong way up, the blood or dye or whatever cant have gone through it, nothing there proves its the same gauze,

                im not trying to fight it because i believe he cheated in the cotto fight too and think the crack in the wraps is more showing than any stain, im just using common sense and recognising that that picture doesnt even prove its the same gauze

                Comment

                • ufirst
                  Contender
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 220
                  • 7
                  • 2
                  • 6,298

                  #28
                  To shift things up a bit; whether Marg cheated or not is yet to be proven BUT IF HE DID, Cotto's fight was probably not the first time he did it. Rember him blowing out Golden Johnson with that fast start on the Mosley/Cotto undercard? Or what about his bout with PWill in which he landed two hard punches in the 10/11th that lumped Paul's face immediately??? The PWill brings me to my point, that Margarito was a bad matchup for Cotto, cheating or not. He took every shot Cotto threw and kept coming & throwing & Cotto was there to be hit. He eventually wore him down. Against Paul Williams Margarito also took everything that was thrown and continued to fire, it's just that Paul wasn't there to be hit much of the fight as he was constantly giving angles and turning Marg after every combo inside. To boot, when Marg, began landing hard shots, PWill stood, answered and outfought him in the last round. If Marg cheated for Cotto, he definitely cheated against PWill; it's just that it was a bad matchup for Cotto; Now please put it to rest & let us move on.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP