I don't think he should ever dq.. It's not really harming anyone. If it's really out of hand I think a point should be deducted. If he continues, keep taking a point away.
I don't think he should ever dq.. It's not really harming anyone. If it's really out of hand I think a point should be deducted. If he continues, keep taking a point away.
Hopkins was the worst against Calzaghe, and his fans excuses were that he was an old man who went on to whoop Pavlik though. And theirs even a gif image of Hopkins looking like he gave an intentional headbutt right infront of Cortez's eyes and Cortez did jack ****.
Keep taking off points for sure, but there has to be a standardised protocol for it. Refs are never consistent in what they see as too much holding - by rights Cortez should've taken loads of points away from Hopkins against Calzaghe, but the ref for Berto-Collazo wasn't right when he took a point off Berto without even warning.
like pittypat says there needs to be some sort of protocol and standards in place, if not no points or dq are really warranted.
There is a place for clinching and when used correctly it's very effective and important tool of boxing. I mean look at shane mosley vs margarito and compare that to cotto vs margarito. One of those guys clinched, the other got KO'd.
Bottom line if a fighter doesnt want to be clinched they wont let themselves be clinched repeatedly. The same way it takes skill in order to wrap a man up, it takes skill to not let such a thing happen. Reaching out to clinch a man is putting yourself in harm's way as you are vulnerable to being hit.
Unless your entire offense consists of clinching as Henry Akinwande's was against Lennox Lewis then neither points nor a possible DQ should ever be used.
Comment