No since BOTH fighters needs to enter into an agreement for a catchweight fight to happen.....
Are Catch Weight Fights destroying fighters and giving unfair advantages?
Collapse
-
JMM is a great name but floyd fought him at a catchweight. are you trying to tell me people wont care about the catchweight of this fight when looking back on mayweathers legacy?Comment
-
Comment
-
so if pacquiao had fought cotto at 147 and won, it would mean just as much as a win with a catchweight of 145?Comment
-
There has not been on fight that I could say well the catchweight they fought in.... I mean yes we talk about Pavlik-Hopkins, Mayweather-Marquez, and Pac-Cotto but that is cuz it's really recent. But, in a few years we will not mentioned it and not care.Comment
-
Comment
-
You know, these catchweights sure get on my nerves! But hey what can we do? I love boxing and always will, catchweights or not.Comment
-
never said cotto would have won with the limit at 147. just saying the win would be better for pac if fought at the welterweight limit.Comment
-
I disagree cuz years from now. Nobody is going to talk about the catchweight. They just going to talk about how great Pac look. Nobody talks about Chavez-Whitaker fight being a catchweight. Nobody talks about Hopkins-Oscar fight being at a catchweight.
There has not been on fight that I could say well the catchweight they fought in.... I mean yes we talk about Pavlik-Hopkins, Mayweather-Marquez, and Pac-Cotto but that is cuz it's really recent. But, in a few years we will not mentioned it and not care.Comment
Comment